We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While working on fractal-analytics-platform/fractal-web#553, I noticed that the images pre- and post-projection are listed with an identical "plate" attribute:
Is this the expected behavior, or should we change it for the projected images?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh, that's an interesting question!
I can really see this being argued either way.
My initial reaction is: We should list the mip plate as 20200812-CardiomyocyteDifferentiation14-Cycle1_mip.zarr to make those distinct.
But one could argue it's really the same plate, just with a different is_3D property
is_3D property
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
While working on fractal-analytics-platform/fractal-web#553, I noticed that the images pre- and post-projection are listed with an identical "plate" attribute:
Is this the expected behavior, or should we change it for the projected images?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: