validation ucn #220
Open
validation ucn #220
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Nous essayons de limiter au maximum l'ajout d'identités dans le fichier database.csv pour réduire les coûts de maintenance et limiter les risques de non conformité au RGPD.
Si vous avez modifié ce fichier, pouvez vous nous préciser ce qui vous a manqué dans les identités déjà présentes dans le fichier et en quoi vos identités résolvent le problème ?
Nous avons besoin de cas spécifique pour notre validation afin de valider que les dossiers des assurés remontent correctement lors de leur franceConnection.
La création de ces dossiers étant complexes, il nous est difficile de les concilier avec des identités existantes dans la base de données fournie.