You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A Python environment with a current version of imagecodecs produces excessively large files.
For the Truck scene with the ours_q_sh_local_test configuration in jxl_quant_sh compression, we expect ~28.8 MB, which we get with imagecodecs 2023.9.18. Here are the results with a current imagecodecs side by side:
Filename
imagecodecs==2023.9.18
imagecodecs==2024.9.22
_features_dc.jxl
1.3 MB
3.1 MB
_features_rest.jxl
16.7 MB
90.6 MB
_opacity.jxl
421.7 kB
2.8 MB
_rotation.jxl
1.5 MB
7.1 MB
_scaling.jxl
2.6 MB
12.8 MB
_xyz.jxl
6.2 MB
12.0 MB
Total Size
28.7 MB
128.3 MB
Needs an investigation why there is such a large (4x) regression in file sizes with different imagecodecs versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
w-m
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 3, 2024
A Python environment with a current version of imagecodecs produces excessively large files.
For the Truck scene with the
ours_q_sh_local_test
configuration injxl_quant_sh
compression, we expect ~28.8 MB, which we get with imagecodecs 2023.9.18. Here are the results with a current imagecodecs side by side:Needs an investigation why there is such a large (4x) regression in file sizes with different imagecodecs versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: