Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always use our own seccomp policy as a default. #926

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

almet
Copy link
Contributor

@almet almet commented Sep 19, 2024

As per Etienne Perot's comment on #908:

Then it seems to me like it would be easy to simply apply this seccomp profile under all container runtimes (since there's no reason why the same image and the same command-line would call different syscalls under different container runtimes).

As mentioned in the comments there, we might want to tighten the default seccomp policy, to have more control on what we accept or not.

Fixes #908

@almet almet force-pushed the 908-define-seccomp-policy branch 2 times, most recently from 2debb87 to f2b04ba Compare September 20, 2024 13:49
@apyrgio
Copy link
Contributor

apyrgio commented Sep 24, 2024

I took the liberty to make some rewordings in the PR, in a separate fixup commit. Also, I've commented on the original issue about our change of course on this subject (see #846 (comment)). Other than that, feel free to squash and merge.

As per Etienne Perot's comment on #908:

> Then it seems to me like it would be easy to simply apply this seccomp
profile under all container runtimes (since there's no reason why the
same image and the same command-line would call different syscalls under
different container runtimes).
@almet almet merged commit 3e434d0 into main Oct 2, 2024
17 of 32 checks passed
@almet almet deleted the 908-define-seccomp-policy branch October 2, 2024 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

All conversions fail with "Unspecified error", using Orbstack
3 participants