Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[docs] Standardize Submission Key language and usage #4413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2019

Conversation

eloquence
Copy link
Member

This also revises the SVS description slightly (nowhere else do we explicitly instruct people to use the SVS for generating journalist keys, and in this context it feels more confusing than helpful). It renames a file that used the old "application key" term.

I chose to use the shorter "Submission Key" instead of "SecureDrop Submission Key" since other terms like Journalist Workstation are also SecureDrop-specific, and the convention to italicize such terms makes it reasonably clear that they carry a context-specific meaning.

I've not disabled whitespace trimming for this PR as we should IMO generally avoid trailing whitespace, but note that this introduces some whitespace removal along the way.

Resolves #2579
Resolves #4122

Status

Ready for review

Checklist

  • Doc linting (make docs-lint) passed locally

This also revises the SVS description slightly (nowhere else
do we explicitly instruct people to use the SVS for _generating_
journalist keys, and in this context it feels more confusing than
helpful). It renames a file that used the old "application key"
term.

I chose to use the shorter "Submission Key" instead of
"SecureDrop Submission Key" since other terms like
*Journalist Workstation* are also SecureDrop-specific, and the
convention to italicize such terms makes it reasonably clear
that they carry a context-specific meaning.

Resolves #2579
Resolves #4122
@eloquence
Copy link
Member Author

If this looks good, I recommend we open a follow-up issue to similarly standardize references to the OSSEC keypair.

One remaining inconsistency is that we refer to the Submission Key as the "journalist key" (in the journalist-key and why-journalist-key URLs, and in the page title "Why download the journalist's public key?") in the Source Interface. I would also recommend addressing this as a follow-up code change.

Copy link
Contributor

@conorsch conorsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@conorsch conorsch merged commit 0f51216 into develop May 9, 2019
@conorsch conorsch deleted the docs-submission-key branch May 9, 2019 16:34
@conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

conorsch commented May 9, 2019

I've not disabled whitespace trimming for this PR as we should IMO generally avoid trailing whitespace

Big fan of cleaning up here. 👌

I recommend we open a follow-up issue to similarly standardize references to the OSSEC keypair.

Totally agree.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
2 participants