Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(cl_scrape_opinions): support nested objects scraper #3864

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grossir
Copy link
Contributor

@grossir grossir commented Mar 6, 2024

Related to freelawproject/juriscraper#883

Main difference is that the nested objects supports OpinionClusters, which may have multiple Opinions. Current data flow is based on a single opinion per item

  • abstracted a few functions to share code with new nested object approach
  • changed update_or_create_docket so it accepts most of docket attributes as arguments
  • added support to create new objects, such as OriginatingCourtInformation

Main difference is that the nested objects supports OpinionClusters, which may have multiple Opinions. Current data flow is based on a single opinion per item

- abstracted a few functions to share code with new nested object approach
@flooie
Copy link
Contributor

flooie commented Jul 2, 2024

What do we need to do to move this forward? @grossir

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants