-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
next: take
, takeWhile
, and similar, methods should also work with generators
#87
Closed
5 tasks done
Tracked by
#57
Labels
Comments
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 16, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2024
elycruz
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2024
issue-#87 - Updates `take*`, and `drop`/`dropWhile`, methods to accept an `Iterable<T>` instead of custom type
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Acceptance Criteria
Update methods to accept
Iterable<T>
instead ofSlice
/(string | array) types.take
takeWhile*
drop
dropWhile
Implementing this for generators isn't possible (in a peformant way) due to generators being direction agnostic.dropWhileEnd
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: