Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update indexes when renaming/deleting fields #13

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: cloned_develop_1824d
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

korbit-ai[bot]
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

When renaming and deleting fields, any indexes that touch the affected fields should also be updated, just like how dataset.app_config is automatically synchronized.

Note: unfortunately MongoDB does not support renaming indexes; they must be dropped and recreated

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced management of dataset schemas with new methods for renaming and deleting fields, ensuring proper index updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed potential inconsistencies between schema changes and index management.
  • Tests

    • Added new tests to validate the functionality of renaming and deleting indexes within a dataset.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the code to ensure indexes are properly updated when fields are renamed or deleted in the dataset schema.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes address the issue of indexes not being updated when fields are renamed or deleted, as reported in voxel51/fiftyone#3185. By adding methods to rename and delete indexes, the dataset maintains consistency and integrity, ensuring that queries remain efficient and accurate. This approach resolves the problem by directly managing index updates alongside field operations.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Clone of the PR voxel51/fiftyone#4698

Copy link

👋 I'm here to help you review your pull request. When you're ready for me to perform a review, you can comment anywhere on this pull request with this command: /korbit-review.

As a reminder, here are some helpful tips on how we can collaborate together:

  • To have me re-scan your pull request, simply re-invoke the /korbit-review command in a new comment.
  • You can interact with me by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in any conversation in your pull requests.
  • On any comment I make on your code, please leave a 👍 if it is helpful and a 👎 if it is unhelpful. This will help me learn and improve as we work together
  • Lastly, to learn more, check out our Docs.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce enhancements to field and index management within a dataset schema. Modifications include refined logic for handling schema paths in the _rename_fields, _clone_fields, and _delete_fields methods, along with the addition of two new methods, _rename_indexes and _delete_indexes, to manage index updates effectively. A new test method is also added to validate these functionalities, ensuring that renaming and deletion of fields correctly affects the dataset's indexing.

Changes

Files Change Summary
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py Modified _rename_fields, _clone_fields, and _delete_fields methods; added _rename_indexes and _delete_indexes methods.
tests/unittests/dataset_tests.py Added test_rename_delete_indexes to validate field renaming and deletion impact on indexing.

Poem

In the meadow where fields once lay,
A rabbit hops, in joy today!
With names that change and indexes neat,
Our data dances on nimble feet.
Hooray for fields, both old and new,
A burrow of wonders, just for you! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1824ddb and 8a47c16.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py (10 hunks)
  • tests/unittests/dataset_tests.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py

1140-1140: Use key in dict instead of key in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

Additional comments not posted (4)
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py (3)

1737-1785: LGTM! Optimize the dictionary key check.

The code changes are approved. However, optimize the dictionary key check as suggested by static analysis tools.

Apply this diff to optimize the dictionary key check:

-    for name in updates.keys():
+    for name in updates:

707-709: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. Ensure that all function calls to _delete_fields handle index deletion correctly.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Verification successful

Function Usage Verified: _delete_fields Handles Index Deletion Correctly

The function _delete_fields is used appropriately in the codebase, ensuring that index deletion is handled correctly. The parameters passed in the calls align with the expected behavior. No further issues were found.

  • File: fiftyone/core/dataset.py

    • Calls to _delete_fields with field_names and error_level.
  • File: fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py

    • Definition of _delete_fields.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_delete_fields` handle index deletion correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'_delete_fields'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_delete_fields` handle index deletion correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type py -A 5 $'_delete_fields'

Length of output: 1852


501-503: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. Ensure that all function calls to _rename_fields handle index renaming correctly.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Verification successful

Function Usage Verified: _rename_fields is Integrated Properly

The _rename_fields method is used across the codebase, particularly in fiftyone/core/dataset.py, and is defined in fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py. The integration suggests that index renaming is handled as intended. Ensure that any changes to this function are reflected in related tests and documentation.

  • Files Involved:
    • fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py
    • fiftyone/core/dataset.py
    • fiftyone/core/singletons.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_rename_fields` handle index renaming correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'_rename_fields'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `_rename_fields` handle index renaming correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type py -A 5 $'_rename_fields'

Length of output: 3788

tests/unittests/dataset_tests.py (1)

2216-2275: LGTM!

The new test method test_rename_delete_indexes is well-implemented and covers the necessary scenarios for renaming and deleting indexes.

Copy link
Author

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant