-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update indexes when renaming/deleting fields #13
base: cloned_develop_1824d
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Clone of the PR voxel51/fiftyone#4698 |
👋 I'm here to help you review your pull request. When you're ready for me to perform a review, you can comment anywhere on this pull request with this command: As a reminder, here are some helpful tips on how we can collaborate together:
|
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to field and index management within a dataset schema. Modifications include refined logic for handling schema paths in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py (10 hunks)
- tests/unittests/dataset_tests.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py
1140-1140: Use
key in dict
instead ofkey in dict.keys()
Remove
.keys()
(SIM118)
Additional comments not posted (4)
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py (3)
1737-1785
: LGTM! Optimize the dictionary key check.The code changes are approved. However, optimize the dictionary key check as suggested by static analysis tools.
Apply this diff to optimize the dictionary key check:
- for name in updates.keys(): + for name in updates:
707-709
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved. Ensure that all function calls to
_delete_fields
handle index deletion correctly.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
_delete_fields
Handles Index Deletion CorrectlyThe function
_delete_fields
is used appropriately in the codebase, ensuring that index deletion is handled correctly. The parameters passed in the calls align with the expected behavior. No further issues were found.
File:
fiftyone/core/dataset.py
- Calls to
_delete_fields
withfield_names
anderror_level
.File:
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py
- Definition of
_delete_fields
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_delete_fields` handle index deletion correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'_delete_fields'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_delete_fields` handle index deletion correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'_delete_fields'Length of output: 1852
501-503
: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved. Ensure that all function calls to
_rename_fields
handle index renaming correctly.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
_rename_fields
is Integrated ProperlyThe
_rename_fields
method is used across the codebase, particularly infiftyone/core/dataset.py
, and is defined infiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py
. The integration suggests that index renaming is handled as intended. Ensure that any changes to this function are reflected in related tests and documentation.
- Files Involved:
fiftyone/core/odm/mixins.py
fiftyone/core/dataset.py
fiftyone/core/singletons.py
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_rename_fields` handle index renaming correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'_rename_fields'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_rename_fields` handle index renaming correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'_rename_fields'Length of output: 3788
tests/unittests/dataset_tests.py (1)
2216-2275
: LGTM!The new test method
test_rename_delete_indexes
is well-implemented and covers the necessary scenarios for renaming and deleting indexes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!
Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.
When renaming and deleting fields, any indexes that touch the affected fields should also be updated, just like how
dataset.app_config
is automatically synchronized.Note: unfortunately MongoDB does not support renaming indexes; they must be dropped and recreated
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Update the code to ensure indexes are properly updated when fields are renamed or deleted in the dataset schema.
Why are these changes being made?
These changes address the issue of indexes not being updated when fields are renamed or deleted, as reported in voxel51/fiftyone#3185. By adding methods to rename and delete indexes, the dataset maintains consistency and integrity, ensuring that queries remain efficient and accurate. This approach resolves the problem by directly managing index updates alongside field operations.