Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added WriteConcern as a param for dataset #14

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: cloned_develop_da22e
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

korbit-ai[bot]
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

For Mongo write operations, WriteConcern is an argument that controls the process of write operations from the client side. Setting the value of w=0 for WriteConcern allows the client to terminate early without waiting for the rest of the clusters to confirm write operations.

For more information on WriteConcern: https://www.mongodb.com/docs/manual/reference/write-concern/

Similarly related, ReadConcern: https://www.mongodb.com/docs/manual/reference/read-concern/

How is this patch tested? If it is not, please explain why.

  • Manual test (✅ )

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change that should be mentioned in the release notes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release
    notes for FiftyOne users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description
if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?

  • App: FiftyOne application changes
  • Build: Build and test infrastructure changes
  • Core: Core fiftyone Python library changes
  • Documentation: FiftyOne documentation changes
  • Other

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced index creation with options for acknowledgment and completion wait, allowing users more control during index creation.
    • Improved handling of MongoDB write operations, providing greater flexibility in dataset management through customizable write concerns.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to collection statistics retrieval by ensuring consistent application of write concerns.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method documentation to clarify the new parameters and their intended use.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Add WriteConcern as a parameter for dataset operations to control acknowledgment behavior during index creation and collection statistics retrieval.

Why are these changes being made?

This change allows for more granular control over the acknowledgment of write operations, which can be useful for optimizing performance in scenarios where immediate acknowledgment is not necessary. By introducing the acknowledged parameter, users can choose whether to wait for index creation confirmation, potentially improving efficiency in large-scale data operations.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Clone of the PR voxel51/fiftyone#4696

Copy link

👋 I'm here to help you review your pull request. When you're ready for me to perform a review, you can comment anywhere on this pull request with this command: /korbit-review.

As a reminder, here are some helpful tips on how we can collaborate together:

  • To have me re-scan your pull request, simply re-invoke the /korbit-review command in a new comment.
  • You can interact with me by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in any conversation in your pull requests.
  • On any comment I make on your code, please leave a 👍 if it is helpful and a 👎 if it is unhelpful. This will help me learn and improve as we work together
  • Lastly, to learn more, check out our Docs.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between da22e0f and 94f79a7.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Author

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants