Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add mask_path to Detection label #16

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: cloned_develop_991c1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

korbit-ai[bot]
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Fix #4486

How is this patch tested? If it is not, please explain why.

I genuinely couldn't figure out how to run the tests, I followed the instructions but kept getting errors when using pytest, so I don't know if I have inadvertently broken something.
I wrote a quick snippet to test the feature instead:

import tempfile
import numpy as np
from PIL import Image
import fiftyone as fo

MASK_SIZE = 256
BBOX = [0, 0, 1, 1]

# create a "mask"
mask = (np.random.rand(MASK_SIZE, MASK_SIZE) * 255).astype(np.uint8)
mask_image = Image.fromarray(mask)
mask_path = tempfile.mktemp(".png")
mask_image.save(mask_path)
print(f"Saved mask to {mask_path}")

# check mask are the same, even though they are stored differently
detection1 = fo.Detection(label="detection1", mask=mask, bounding_box=BBOX)
detection2 = fo.Detection(label="detection2", mask_path=mask_path, bounding_box=BBOX)
assert np.allclose(detection1.get_mask(), detection2.get_mask()), "detection masks are different"  # type: ignore
print(detection1, detection2)

# check polyline conversion
polyline1 = detection1.to_polyline()
polyline2 = detection2.to_polyline()
assert np.allclose(polyline1.points, polyline2.points), "polyline points are different" # type: ignore

# check mask export
mask2_path = tempfile.mktemp(".png")
detection1.export_mask(mask2_path, update=True)
print(f"Exported mask to {mask2_path}")
mask2_image = Image.open(mask2_path)
mask2 = np.array(mask2_image)
assert np.allclose(mask, mask2), "exported mask is different"
print(detection1, detection2)

# check mask import
detection2.import_mask(update=True)
assert np.allclose(detection1.get_mask(), detection2.get_mask()), "imported mask is different"  # type: ignore
print(detection1, detection2)

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change that should be mentioned in the release notes?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for FiftyOne users.

Allows Detections to store masks on disk, this allows to offload some disk usage from the mongo database to somewhere else. See also #4486

What areas of FiftyOne does this PR affect?

  • App: FiftyOne application changes
  • Build: Build and test infrastructure changes
  • Core: Core fiftyone Python library changes
  • Documentation: FiftyOne documentation changes
  • Other

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new capabilities for managing instance segmentation masks in the Detection class, including import/export functionality and transformations.
    • Enhanced mask retrieval processes across various modules for improved maintainability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated checks for mask presence to utilize the new mask retrieval methods, ensuring consistent access and functionality.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Add a mask_path attribute to the Detection label class to support handling instance segmentation masks stored on disk, and update related methods to utilize this new attribute.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes are being made to enhance the flexibility of the Detection label class by allowing it to reference segmentation masks stored as files on disk, which can be more efficient for large datasets. This approach provides an alternative to storing masks directly in memory, thus optimizing resource usage and potentially improving performance when dealing with large-scale image datasets.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Clone of the PR voxel51/fiftyone#4693

Copy link

👋 I'm here to help you review your pull request. When you're ready for me to perform a review, you can comment anywhere on this pull request with this command: /korbit-review.

As a reminder, here are some helpful tips on how we can collaborate together:

  • To have me re-scan your pull request, simply re-invoke the /korbit-review command in a new comment.
  • You can interact with me by tagging @development-korbit-ai-mentor in any conversation in your pull requests.
  • On any comment I make on your code, please leave a 👍 if it is helpful and a 👎 if it is unhelpful. This will help me learn and improve as we work together
  • Lastly, to learn more, check out our Docs.

Copy link
Author

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 991c1d0 and e0718b9.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Author

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary by Korbit AI

Code Execution Comments

  • Handle potential AttributeError in detection.get_mask() with try/except to ensure robust execution.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Tests
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ def to_detected_object(detection, name=None, extra_attrs=True):
bry = tly + h
bounding_box = etag.BoundingBox.from_coords(tlx, tly, brx, bry)

mask = detection.mask
mask = detection.get_mask()
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

category Error Handling

The code is accessing the get_mask() method of the detection object without handling the potential AttributeError exception that could be raised if the method is not defined. To make this code more robust, consider wrapping the detection.get_mask() call in a try/except block that catches AttributeError and handles it appropriately, such as setting mask to None or providing a default mask value if the method is not available.

Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant