-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AnimationClip
support any target
#1009
AnimationClip
support any target
#1009
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 36.50% // Head: 36.07% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev/0.9 #1009 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 36.50% 36.07% -0.44%
===========================================
Files 333 341 +8
Lines 14821 15059 +238
Branches 2273 2284 +11
===========================================
+ Hits 5410 5432 +22
- Misses 8806 9007 +201
- Partials 605 620 +15
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
* @internal | ||
*/ | ||
static _lerpValue(srcValue: boolean, destValue: boolean): boolean { | ||
return destValue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe is srcValue?
De temp file |
refactor: opt code
… into feat/customAnimationClip
AnimationClip
support any target
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
Other information: