You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Original comment by Andrew Benson (Bitbucket: abensonca, GitHub: abensonca).
Another approach (suggested by Jaswant Yadav), would be to allocate space for just one property (e.g. mass, position, etc.) at a time, read that property, then store to file. This might be easier to code, but would require multiple passes through file I/O. It might also be less flexible overall - if you had a really big tree file then it could overflow memory even reading one property at a time, whereas processing in blocks might not.
Original report by Andrew Benson (Bitbucket: abensonca, GitHub: abensonca).
Using, e.g. Simple_Merger_Tree_File_Maker.exe on very large input files will run out of memory. Could fix this by processing trees in batches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: