Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Systemd service unit template only works with root-dir layout #138

Open
natefoo opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Systemd service unit template only works with root-dir layout #138

natefoo opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@natefoo
Copy link
Member

natefoo commented Aug 23, 2021

This is because it consumes galaxy_root. On other layouts we should use a sensible default.

@hexylena
Copy link
Member

urgh, curse of the configuration matrix. yea we should fix that. I wish we had data for how many people actually used things other than root-dir, because I suspect it's 1% of folks.

@natefoo
Copy link
Member Author

natefoo commented Sep 1, 2021

You kinda shouldn't use root-dir for network filesystems though, as there is a lot of stuff that is better kept local. I actually was trying to come up with a new standard layout that properly splits things up for a standard secured network deployment but it's trickier than I expected.

@nuwang
Copy link
Member

nuwang commented Sep 2, 2021

This would be great @natefoo. The k8s deployments could also benefit from this, especially when dispatching to existing clusters.

@dometto
Copy link
Contributor

dometto commented Apr 30, 2024

What is currently the recommended layout to use if you would like to have the datadir on NFS?

I'm managing to do so with a custom layout, but am running into this issue. Is there currentlt a good workaround for this issue? Would it be possible to simply pass in a different value into the systemd template when galaxy_root is not set?

I can still get everything to work by setting galaxy_manage_systemd to false, and then manually running galaxyctl start, which bootstraps the systemd services. But it feels counterintuitive to set galaxy_manage_systemd to false.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants