Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repeatmasking and funannotate: pre-smorg review #4023

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 3, 2023

Conversation

abretaud
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewed the repeat masking tutorial before re-recording it. Mainly small cosmetic changes + added a "details" block about repeatmodeler.

Ran it successfully on .fr and .eu

@abretaud abretaud added genome-annotation re-record Potentially implies re-recording is necessary as this PR affects key galaxy concepts for users. labels Apr 17, 2023
@abretaud abretaud requested a review from a team as a code owner April 17, 2023 12:27
@hexylena
Copy link
Member

if you ran it - did you have a workflow invocation? If so we could write a test for this, and test it automatially across the other N usegalaxy.*s

@abretaud
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good idea!

Also just saw the answer in galaxyproject/galaxy#15945 + there are new repeatmasker/modeler releases => will see if I can update these before merging. So switching to draft mode

@abretaud abretaud marked this pull request as draft April 17, 2023 12:32
@hexylena
Copy link
Member

awesome!

shiltemann
shiltemann previously approved these changes Apr 19, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the faqs label Apr 24, 2023
@abretaud abretaud marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2023 15:37
@abretaud
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Should be good now 🤞

@abretaud abretaud changed the title Repeatmasking: pre-smorg review Repeatmasking and funannotate: pre-smorg review Apr 26, 2023
@@ -51,4 +51,16 @@ contributors: [hexylena]
```

9. You will need to check the `-tests.yml` file, it has some automatically generated comparisons. Namely it tests that output data matches the test-data exactly, however, you might want to replace that with assertions that check for e.g. correct file size, or specific text content you expect to see.
10. Contribute all of those files to the GTN in a PR.

10. If the files in test-data are already uploaded to Zenodo, to save disk space, you should delete them from the `test-data` dir and use their URL in the `-tests.yml` file, as in this example:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💛

Copy link
Member

@hexylena hexylena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!!! workflow tests are fantastic

@hexylena hexylena merged commit f6cb02d into galaxyproject:main May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
faqs genome-annotation re-record Potentially implies re-recording is necessary as this PR affects key galaxy concepts for users.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants