Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Payment Channels review #1

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Payment Channels review #1

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

galt-tr
Copy link
Owner

@galt-tr galt-tr commented Jul 29, 2020

No description provided.


### Create Payment Channel

Choose a globally unique identifier for `paymentChannel` and create it. Optionally provide a `rawtx` for the initial transaction statte.
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

statte

state

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will, fix thank you


```javascript
{
"rawtx": '003222...' // Optional initial rawtx to initialize with. If left empty then use "Updates" to change
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to confirm, so if I initialize a payment channel with TXQ and the server is restarted before the channel is closed, I would need to re-initialize the payment channel with rawtx of the original initiation and this would work. Is that correct?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. The payment channel will be persisted to DB, so if TXQ reboots you can continue where you left off.

I haven't updated the database schema yet, as this is just a proposal first to make sure it's the correct thing to build.

"result": {
"closed": false, // Whether the channel is closed manually or one of the inputs was spent by an actual tx broadcasted
"state": {
"id": 135,
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What exactly is id here? A random int?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only asking because we already have paymentchannelid

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

id is the primary key of the tx (rawtx) in the database. The number is always guaranteed to be unique and increasing (but not necessarily consecutive, in other words it is monotonically increasing)

The purpose is an alternate id that you know is unique and chronologically ordered. It let's you know if a state is newer than another one by mere virtue of the fact that the latest state has a higher id.

It's not necessarily to expose to the client, perhaps I can hide it here. It may be useful to keep this in the sse updates because then it's easy to see when a state is newer.

**Note:** The payment channel will automatically be closed if a transaction is broadcast via `/mapi` or `/tx`
when one of the inputs being spent collide with any transactions associated with a payment channel.

Client may forcefully close payment channel without broadcasting a transaction. No further additional transactions may be added
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the channel is closed and the tx is not broadcasted, just save the rawtx locally and can broadcast whenever.

Q: Are payment channels pruned from TXQ? Or will all payment channels always exist in the database?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the SQL file I noticed that we don't store in the database whether the channel was closed and the transaction was broadcasted. Would this be valuable to add?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the channel is closed and the tx is not broadcasted, just save the rawtx locally and can broadcast whenever.

Good point! The client can fetch the rawtx/latest state of the channel and broadcast, perfect!

Looking at the SQL file I noticed that we don't store in the database whether the channel was closed and the transaction was broadcasted. Would this be valuable to add?

I haven't really finished the schema. But very good points, I'll add them both in :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants