Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade kind, kindest/node and kubectl in hack/ #954

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

renormalize
Copy link
Member

@renormalize renormalize commented Dec 20, 2024

How to categorize this PR?

/area dev-productivity
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • Bumps kind to v0.26.0.
  • Bumps kindest/node to v1.32.0.
  • Bumps kubectl to v1.32.0.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:
@Shreyas-s14

Release note:

Upgrade `kind` to `v0.26.0`, `kindest/node` to `v1.32.0`, and `kubectl` to `v1.32.0` for local development.

@renormalize renormalize added the area/dev-productivity Developer productivity related (how to improve development) label Dec 20, 2024
@renormalize renormalize requested a review from a team as a code owner December 20, 2024 05:15
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Dec 20, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Dec 20, 2024
* Upgrade `kind` to `v0.26.0`.

* Upgrade `kindest/node` to `v1.32.0`.

* Upgrade `kubectl` to `v1.32.0`.
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 20, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 20, 2024
@renormalize renormalize changed the title Upgrade kind to v0.26.0 and kindest/node to v1.32.0 Upgrade kind, kindest/node and kubectl in hack/ Dec 20, 2024
@renormalize
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@seshachalam-yv seshachalam-yv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @renormalize, for updating the Kind setup versions! Your effort is much appreciated.
/lgtm

@seshachalam-yv seshachalam-yv merged commit 4d853c4 into gardener:master Dec 20, 2024
13 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) and removed needs/review Needs review labels Dec 20, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Dec 20, 2024
@renormalize renormalize deleted the kind branch February 13, 2025 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/dev-productivity Developer productivity related (how to improve development) kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants