Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor gardener@1.54.0 and Handle PodDisruptionBudget policy/v1 #126

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 2, 2022

Conversation

shafeeqes
Copy link
Contributor

@shafeeqes shafeeqes commented Sep 1, 2022

How to categorize this PR?

/area networking
/kind enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

  • Vendor gardener@v1.54.0
  • Handle PodDisruptionBudget policy/v1
  • Switch from k8s.gcr.io to registry.k8s.io, ref k8s v1.25 announcement

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of gardener/gardener#6567

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

The following dependency is updated:
- github.com/gardener/gardener: v1.52.2 -> v1.54.0
- k8s.io/* : v0.24.3 -> v0.24.4

@shafeeqes shafeeqes requested review from a team as code owners September 1, 2022 03:07
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added area/networking Networking related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Sep 1, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 1, 2022
@shafeeqes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/squash

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' label Sep 1, 2022
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 1, 2022
@shafeeqes shafeeqes marked this pull request as draft September 1, 2022 06:54
@shafeeqes shafeeqes marked this pull request as ready for review September 1, 2022 07:59
@shafeeqes shafeeqes marked this pull request as draft September 2, 2022 09:11
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 2, 2022
@shafeeqes shafeeqes marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2022 10:45
Copy link
Member

@ScheererJ ScheererJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@ScheererJ ScheererJ merged commit 99afc64 into gardener:master Sep 2, 2022
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) and removed needs/review Needs review labels Sep 2, 2022
@shafeeqes shafeeqes deleted the vendor/gardener branch September 9, 2022 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/networking Networking related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension merge/squash Should be merged via 'Squash and merge' needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants