Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data disk image reference #891

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hebelsan
Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan commented Jun 13, 2024

How to categorize this PR?

/area usability
/kind enhancement
/platform azure

What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds the ability to attach dataDisks with image references

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #788

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Adds the ability to attach dataDisks with image references

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added kind/api-change API change with impact on API users needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else area/usability Usability related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure needs/rebase Needs git rebase labels Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@hebelsan You need rebase this pull request with latest master branch. Please check.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 13, 2024
@hebelsan hebelsan changed the title First implementation Data disk image reference Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 26, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jun 26, 2024
@hebelsan hebelsan marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2024 13:42
@hebelsan hebelsan requested review from a team as code owners June 26, 2024 13:42
@hebelsan
Copy link
Contributor Author

hebelsan commented Aug 2, 2024

/hold until gardener/machine-controller-manager-provider-azure#165 is merged and released

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies label Aug 2, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 13, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 30, 2024
@@ -19,8 +19,13 @@ type WorkerConfig struct {
// NodeTemplate contains resource information of the machine which is used by Cluster Autoscaler to generate nodeTemplate during scaling a nodeGroup from zero.
// +optional
NodeTemplate *extensionsv1alpha1.NodeTemplate `json:"nodeTemplate,omitempty"`
// DiagnosticsProfile specifies boot diagnostic options

// DiagnosticsProfile specifies boot diagnostic options.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since you went into the trouble to add the new line, please also add the +optional here

// +optional
SkipMarketplaceAgreement *bool `json:"skipMarketplaceAgreement,omitempty"`
// Image identifies the azure image.
Image
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if we want to do that or something like:

imageRef Image `json",inline"`

I think this is more clean to be honest and I believe this to be backwards compatible too. WDYT ?

@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 1, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 1, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/rebase Needs git rebase needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Oct 1, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Oct 1, 2024
@hebelsan hebelsan merged commit bdea1b1 into gardener:master Oct 1, 2024
15 checks passed
@hebelsan hebelsan deleted the disk-image-ref branch October 1, 2024 13:24
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/usability Usability related kind/api-change API change with impact on API users kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integrate vSMP MemeoryOne in Azure
6 participants