Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce the log level of cinder-csi-driver #288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2021

Conversation

ialidzhikov
Copy link
Member

/kind enhancement
/platform openstack

As described in #287, the csi-driver-node logging is verbose and noisy.

Except the livenessprobe container, the csi-driver container is noisy as well. It generates a lot of logs such as:

I0524 20:01:44.879641       1 utils.go:81] GRPC request:
I0524 20:01:44.879674       1 identityserver.go:50] Probe() called with req
I0524 20:01:44.885084       1 utils.go:86] GRPC response:
I0524 20:01:54.879767       1 utils.go:80] GRPC call: /csi.v1.Identity/Probe
I0524 20:01:54.879837       1 utils.go:81] GRPC request:
I0524 20:01:54.879872       1 identityserver.go:50] Probe() called with req
I0524 20:01:54.883811       1 utils.go:86] GRPC response:
I0524 20:02:04.879962       1 utils.go:80] GRPC call: /csi.v1.Identity/Probe
I0524 20:02:04.879978       1 utils.go:81] GRPC request:
I0524 20:02:04.880007       1 identityserver.go:50] Probe() called with req
I0524 20:02:04.884123       1 utils.go:86] GRPC response:

Release note:

NONE

Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure needs/review Needs review size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels May 24, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 24, 2021
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels May 24, 2021
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2021 20:30
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov requested review from a team as code owners May 24, 2021 20:30
Copy link
Member

@vpnachev vpnachev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels May 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/openstack OpenStack platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging size/xs Size of pull request is tiny (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants