Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(gatsby): [rendering engines] use results of exports removal if sourceMap was not generated alongside transformed code (#37282) #37299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2022
Merged

fix(gatsby): [rendering engines] use results of exports removal if sourceMap was not generated alongside transformed code (#37282) #37299

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2022

Conversation

gatsbybot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backporting #37282 to the 4.25 release branch

(cherry picked from commit 770748d)

@pieh
fix(gatsby): [rendering engines] use results of exports removal if so…
a250e96 
…urceMap was not generated alongside transformed code (#37282)

* fix(gatsby): [rendering engines] use results of exports removal if sourceMap was not generated alongside transformed code

* chore: regenerate also page-ssr bundle in standalone-regenerate

(cherry picked from commit 770748d)
@gatsbot gatsbot bot added the status: triage needed Issue or pull request that need to be triaged and assigned to a reviewer label Dec 20, 2022
@pieh pieh removed the status: triage needed Issue or pull request that need to be triaged and assigned to a reviewer label Dec 20, 2022
@pieh pieh merged commit 48a3db4 into release/4.25 Dec 20, 2022
@pieh pieh deleted the backport-4.25-37282 branch December 20, 2022 16:16
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
@0xSebin 0xSebin mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
@0xSebin 0xSebin mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
This was referenced Jan 12, 2023
Open
Open
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
This was referenced May 26, 2023
Open
Open
This was referenced May 26, 2023
Open
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
@Rutam21 Rutam21 mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
This was referenced May 26, 2023
Open
Open
@monizb monizb mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
Open
This was referenced May 27, 2023
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
@nidhi42 nidhi42 mentioned this pull request May 30, 2023
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request May 30, 2023
Open
@kaocher82 kaocher82 mentioned this pull request May 30, 2023
Open
This was referenced May 31, 2023
Open
Open
@MaxMood96 MaxMood96 mentioned this pull request May 31, 2023
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2023
Open
@snyk-bot snyk-bot mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: cherry
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@gatsbybot @pieh