Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part of #7284 --- just dropping in the note #7397

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2018
Merged

Part of #7284 --- just dropping in the note #7397

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2018

Conversation

moxiegirl
Copy link

Entering the note mentioned in #7284

@pieh
Copy link
Contributor

pieh commented Aug 17, 2018

/cc @amberleyromo @shannonbux

Copy link
Contributor

@shannonbux shannonbux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @moxiegirl!

@amberleyromo can you confirm that the details are technically accurate as well?

Why use two different queries here? These examples were quick introductions to
the query types, how they are formatted, and where they can be used. Just remember,
only pages can make page queries and non-page components, like Layout, can use
StaticQuery. In part 7 the tutorial explains these in more depth.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rewrite this to say: "non-page components. For example, Layout can use StaticQuery. Part 7 of the tutorial explains this concept in greater depth."

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That actually splits up the sentence kind of oddly, imo. I would personally edit to a hybrid of the two:

Why use two different methods to query here? For now, keep in mind that only page components can make page queries (using the graphql tag), and non-page components use StaticQuery instead. Part seven of the tutorial explains this concept in greater depth.

In talking about the two different methods I try to pattern it with "page components" and "non-page components" for clarity.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also @moxiegirl I apologize for the tardy response, I missed this notification!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My impression was the whole preceding section is a taster for something to be detailed later thus requiring a short note to point this fact out. @shannonbux that is why I used a simple parenthetical phrase rather than drawing out the topic into its own sentence.

No worries @amberleyromo I know y'all are trying to get a release out. Your rewrite retains the question which isn't answered by the subsequent sentence. The paragraph probably needs to answer the opening question to be logical. IMO, the question is necessary because why did the writer use so much space on the query topic if the information wasn't important.

Anecdotal: I recall the first time I walked through this tutorial as a new Gatsby user wondering why I was put through all this work only to throw it away by reverting the work. The balance was off.

Copy link
Contributor

@shannonbux shannonbux Aug 30, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, what about this then:

Why use two different methods to query here? These examples were quick introductions to the query types, how they are formatted, and where they can be used. For now, keep in mind that only page components can make page queries (using the graphql tag), and non-page components use StaticQuery instead. Part seven of the tutorial explains this concept in greater depth.

@moxiegirl
Copy link
Author

It looks like this is not going to merge. It is small...you ok with me closing it?

@amberleyromo
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @moxiegirl -- Apologies, this just fell off my radar. Can you just add a link on "part 7 the tutorial" to /tutorial/part-seven? Then good to go. Thank you!

moxiegirl and others added 2 commits October 19, 2018 11:46
Also added in some language from a quick review.

Signed-off-by: moxiegirl <moxieandmore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: moxiegirl <moxieandmore@gmail.com>
@moxiegirl moxiegirl requested a review from a team October 19, 2018 19:06
@moxiegirl
Copy link
Author

@amberleyromo this last commit has the requested link. Apologies for the delayed response.

@amberleyromo amberleyromo merged commit 2bbace4 into gatsbyjs:master Oct 24, 2018
gpetrioli pushed a commit to gpetrioli/gatsby that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2019
* Part of gatsbyjs#7204
Also added in some language from a quick review.

Signed-off-by: moxiegirl <moxieandmore@gmail.com>

* Responding to @amberleyromo comment

Signed-off-by: moxiegirl <moxieandmore@gmail.com>

* tweaks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants