Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gazebo-classic "C++ CI Workflow with conda-forge dependencies" job failing since two weeks ago on macOS #3313

Closed
traversaro opened this issue Apr 15, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3315
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator

Last successful job: https://github.com/gazebosim/gazebo-classic/actions/runs/4549669663
First failing job: https://github.com/gazebosim/gazebo-classic/actions/runs/4559987576
Last (at the moment of the opening of the issue) failing job: https://github.com/gazebosim/gazebo-classic/actions/runs/4705540516

@traversaro traversaro added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 15, 2023
@traversaro traversaro changed the title gazebo-classic "C++ CI Workflow with conda-forge dependencies" job failing since two weeks ago gazebo-classic "C++ CI Workflow with conda-forge dependencies" job failing since two weeks ago on macOS Apr 15, 2023
@traversaro
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The failure is:

In file included from /Users/runner/miniconda3/envs/test/include/boost/type_index.hpp:29:
In file included from /Users/runner/miniconda3/envs/test/include/boost/type_index/stl_type_index.hpp:47:
/Users/runner/miniconda3/envs/test/include/boost/container_hash/hash.hpp:131:33: error: no template named 'unary_function' in namespace 'std'; did you mean '__unary_function'?
        struct hash_base : std::unary_function<T, std::size_t> {};
                           ~~~~~^
/Users/runner/miniconda3/envs/test/bin/../include/c++/v1/__functional/unary_function.h:46:1: note: '__unary_function' declared here
using __unary_function = __unary_function_keep_layout_base<_Arg, _Result>;
^
1 error generated.

So, the issue is related to conda-forge/boost-cpp-feedstock#134, that was fixed for boost 1.78 . However, for some reason that I do not fully understand we are using an older boost in the CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant