-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
refactor: llguidance #288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
guicho271828
wants to merge
10
commits into
generative-computing:main
Choose a base branch
from
guicho271828:llguidance
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,140
−604
Open
refactor: llguidance #288
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
21a57ef
refactor: removed outlines from vllm/hf backend, use latest vllm, V1 …
guicho271828 b6c1eb3
fix: conda should not always supersede mamba
guicho271828 35d9521
fix(test): hf test uses a smaller model
guicho271828 fbd37f1
fixup! refactor: removed outlines from vllm/hf backend, use latest vl…
guicho271828 f3b4591
fixup! refactor: removed outlines from vllm/hf backend, use latest vl…
guicho271828 20ae052
fixup! refactor: removed outlines from vllm/hf backend, use latest vl…
guicho271828 1987115
fix: force vllm >= 0.13.0 and updated lock
guicho271828 62923fe
fixup! refactor: removed outlines from vllm/hf backend, use latest vl…
guicho271828 7eee2f1
Merge branch 'main' into llguidance
guicho271828 29588fb
fix: disable vllm on darwin
guicho271828 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, when I was trying this locally (
uv run pytest test/backends/test_vllm.pyon Fedora 43, Python 3.12.8, CUDA 13.0), thetest_generate_from_raw_with_formattest failed. Here's a snippet of the output:Seems like what's happening is that the model is following the grammar but not valid JSON (which seems like may just be a fact of life with a tiny model, I see the vllm test is using qwen3 0.6b).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A quick hack I tried locally that got the test to pass was to add an additional prompt to the list around using proper json content:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could make this error message better, but I think what's happening is that the model runs out of tokens before the json completes (at least I see this error with hf sometimes):
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, that seems to be it. just re-ran the test and I see:
and also
though it's interesting, on my run looks like the string is an opening bracket and then a LOT of newlines...