ajudst ogr time type to json format

[michaelmattig]

• I added an entry to CHANGELOG.md if knowledge of this change could be valuable to users.

---

Here is a brief summary of what I did:

[michaelmattig]

UI für OGR Datasets

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11462993098

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 139 of 167 (83.23%) changed or added relevant lines in 7 files are covered.
• 66 unchanged lines in 10 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 91.016%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
services/src/api/handlers/datasets.rs	69	72	95.83%
services/src/api/model/datatypes.rs	54	79	68.35%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
services/src/datasets/external/netcdfcf/mod.rs	1	95.38%
services/src/pro/quota/mod.rs	1	94.12%
services/src/datasets/external/aruna/mock_grpc_server.rs	1	82.93%
services/src/api/handlers/datasets.rs	1	94.81%
services/src/api/handlers/workflows.rs	1	90.44%
services/src/datasets/external/netcdfcf/ebvportal_api.rs	2	94.95%
services/src/pro/contexts/postgres.rs	2	96.78%
services/src/datasets/external/pangaea/mod.rs	2	86.48%
services/src/datasets/external/netcdfcf/ebvportal_provider.rs	4	92.77%
services/src/datasets/external/gfbio_collections.rs	51	81.8%

Totals
Change from base Build 10831780732:	-0.003%
Covered Lines:	133843
Relevant Lines:	147055

---

💛 - Coveralls

[ChristianBeilschmidt]

This looks rather complicated. Maybe test it?

[michaelmattig]

actually I just copied the code from datatypes:

geoengine/datatypes/src/primitives/datetime.rs

Line 393 in 28a9f22

pub fn custom(fmt: String) -> Self {

and there it actually is tested. Should I maybe just use that method and then implement From/Into? But then parsing changes in datatypes would reflect in api... so maybe just copy the test as well?

[ChristianBeilschmidt]

Add one success case test?

[michaelmattig]

c2418df