You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have searched the EvaDB issues and found no similar feature requests.
Description
We provide a whole bunch of options to the user when creating the FORECASTING UDF, however, it might not be trivial to realize which options would work the best. It would be great if feedback could be provided when a UDF is called and performs subpar.
Use case
Users using the FORECASTING UDF and having complicated datasets.
Are you willing to submit a PR?
Yes I'd like to help by submitting a PR!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Provide feedback when `Forecasting` UDF is called in the following ways:
- [x] Reporting confidence intervals
- [x] Returning a metric for the forecasting performance.
- [x] Providing suggestions in simple special cases, such as during Flat
predictions.
Eg:
```sql
SELECT HomeForecast();
```
```
SUGGESTION: Predictions are flat. Consider using LIBRARY 'neuralforecast' for more accrate predictions.
```
Partially fixes#1257 and #1243.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andy Xu <xzdandy@gmail.com>
Search before asking
Description
We provide a whole bunch of options to the user when creating the
FORECASTING
UDF, however, it might not be trivial to realize which options would work the best. It would be great if feedback could be provided when a UDF is called and performs subpar.Use case
Users using the
FORECASTING
UDF and having complicated datasets.Are you willing to submit a PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: