Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate SP3 lib to ecosystem #168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2023
Merged

Integrate SP3 lib to ecosystem #168

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

gwbres
Copy link
Collaborator

@gwbres gwbres commented Sep 15, 2023

One solution to having a single cargo workspace for this ecosystem is either

  • integrate SP3 into this crate: which facilitates future developments (use cargo local referencing)
  • move all applications (non libraries, ie., library users like rinex-cli) into an external workspace

Having SP3 into this is probably the best solution.
For example rinex-qc makes no sense without SP3 and RINEX knowledge.
rinex-cli is a heavy user of rinex-qc (one of the two major opmodes).
Also, new developments (advanced geodesics), calls for rinex-cli using local referencing.

I think that answers the question.

One solution to having a single cargo workspace for this ecosystem is either

* have SP3 into this crate: which facilitates future developments
* move all applications (non libraries, ie., library users like rinex-cli)
into an external workspace

Having SP3 into this is probably the best solution.
For example "rinex-qc" makes no sense without SP3 and RINEX knowledge.
"rinex-cli" is a heavy user of "rinex-qc" (one of the two major opmodes).
I think that answers the question.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
@gwbres gwbres added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feature Request new feature labels Sep 15, 2023
@gwbres gwbres added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Sep 15, 2023
@gwbres gwbres self-assigned this Sep 15, 2023
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Sep 15, 2023

Note that you can use git-subtree or josh to move a git repository to another one, while keeping the history intact.

I've used the former, but can't say it's very pleasant.

.gitignore Show resolved Hide resolved
@lnicola
Copy link
Member

lnicola commented Sep 15, 2023

while keeping the history intact

image

Okay, maybe let's not bother 😂.

@gwbres
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gwbres commented Sep 15, 2023

Note that you can use git-subtree or josh to move a git repository to another one, while keeping the history intact.

I've used the former, but can't say it's very pleasant.

good to know 👍 Probably not needed on this one, considering this repo is almost brand new

@gwbres gwbres merged commit f00effd into main Sep 15, 2023
@gwbres gwbres deleted the sp3 branch September 18, 2023 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feature Request new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants