Fix several minor issues that were not addressed in PR #226 (the netCDF-F90 update)

[yantosca]

Name and Institution (Required)

Name: Bob Yantosca
Institution: Harvard + GCST

Confirm you have reviewed the following documentation

• Contributing guidelines

Describe the update

This PR fixes several issues with the prior PR #226. In particular:

• The hco_m_netcdf_io_write.F90 was never updated to use netCDF-F90 library functions; this is now fixed.
• Replaced lingering netCDF-F77 library calls with netCDF-F90 equivalents
• Fixed typos and removed extraneous code

Expected changes

This is a zero-diff update, as it does not touch any science code.

Reference(s)

N/A

Related Github Issue(s)

• Update netCDF code (in src/Shared/NcdfUtil) to use the netCDF-F90 interface #226
• Need to update HEMCO I/O routines to use the netCDF-F90 interface #225
• Convert GEOS-Chem netCDF utility routines to use the netCDF-F90 interface geos-chem#1882

Closes #225

[yantosca]

After merging on top of PR #226 and PR geoschem/geos-chem#1879, all GEOS-Chem Classic integration tests passed (except TOMAS, which is a known issue):

==============================================================================
GEOS-Chem Classic: Execution Test Results

GCClassic #2773dc8 GEOS-Chem submod updates: Set ESMF logging mode at run-time
GEOS-Chem #5c8050f08 Merge PR #1882 (Convert GEOS-Chem netCDF routines to use netCDF-F90)
HEMCO     #599775d Merge PR #227 (Fix several minor issues not addressed in PR #226)

Using 24 OpenMP threads
Number of execution tests: 26

Submitted as SLURM job: 63552572
==============================================================================
 
Execution tests:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gc_05x0625_NA_47L_merra2_CH4........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_05x0625_NA_47L_merra2_fullchem...................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem..........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem_TOMAS15..................Execute Simulation....FAIL
gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem_TOMAS40..................Execute Simulation....FAIL
gc_4x5_merra2_aerosol...............................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_carbon................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_CH4...................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_CO2...................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem..............................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_aciduptake...................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM..........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_benchmark....................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_complexSOA...................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_complexSOA_SVPOA.............Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_LuoWd........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_marinePOA....................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_Hg....................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_metals................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_POPs_BaP..............................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_tagCH4................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_tagCO.................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_tagO3.................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_TransportTracers......................Execute Simulation....PASS
gc_4x5_merra2_TransportTracers_LuoWd................Execute Simulation....PASS
 
Summary of test results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Execution tests passed: 24
Execution tests failed: 2
Execution tests not yet completed: 0

Furthermore, most integration tests were identical to PR #1879. The exceptions are:

• TOMAS (failed integration tests)
• APM (known parallelization issue, will be fixed later)
• RRTMG diagnostic output (known parallelization issue, will be fixed later)

Checking gc_05x0625_NA_47L_merra2_CH4
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_05x0625_NA_47L_merra2_fullchem
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem_TOMAS15
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_47L_merra2_fullchem_TOMAS40
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_aerosol
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_carbon
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_CH4
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_CO2
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_aciduptake
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM
   -> 2 differences found in OutputDir
      * GCC_14.2.1_r12/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/OutputDir/GEOSChem.Metrics.20190701_0000z.nc4 
        GCC_14.2.1_r13/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/OutputDir/GEOSChem.Metrics.20190701_0000z.nc4 
      * GCC_14.2.1_r12/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/OutputDir/GEOSChem.SpeciesConc.20190701_0000z.nc4 
        GCC_14.2.1_r13/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/OutputDir/GEOSChem.SpeciesConc.20190701_0000z.nc4 
   -> 1 difference found in Restarts
      * GCC_14.2.1_r12/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/Restarts/GEOSChem.Restart.20190701_0100z.nc4 
        GCC_14.2.1_r13/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_APM/Restarts/GEOSChem.Restart.20190701_0100z.nc4 

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_benchmark
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_complexSOA
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_complexSOA_SVPOA
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_LuoWd
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_marinePOA
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG
   -> 1 difference found in OutputDir
      * GCC_14.2.1_r12/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG/OutputDir/GEOSChem.RRTMG.20190701_0000z.nc4 
        GCC_14.2.1_r13/rundirs/gc_4x5_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG/OutputDir/GEOSChem.RRTMG.20190701_0000z.nc4 
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_Hg
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_metals
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_POPs_BaP
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_tagCH4
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_tagCO
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_tagO3
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_TransportTracers
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gc_4x5_merra2_TransportTracers_LuoWd
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

[yantosca]

After merging on top of PR #226 and PR geoschem/geos-chem#1879, all GCHP integration tests passed:

GCHP: Execution Test Results

GCClassic #5994b33 Merge PR #330 (Set ESMF logging option at run-time via config file)
GEOS-Chem #5c8050f08 Merge PR #1882 (Convert GEOS-Chem netCDF routines to use netCDF-F90)
HEMCO     #599775d Merge PR #227 (Fix several minor issues not addressed in PR #226)

Number of execution tests: 5

Submitted as SLURM job: 63553029
==============================================================================
 
Execution tests:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gchp_merra2_fullchem................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gchp_merra2_fullchem_benchmark......................Execute Simulation....PASS
gchp_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG..........................Execute Simulation....PASS
gchp_merra2_tagO3...................................Execute Simulation....PASS
gchp_merra2_TransportTracers........................Execute Simulation....PASS
 
Summary of test results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Execution tests passed: 5
Execution tests failed: 0
Execution tests not yet completed: 0

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%  All execution tests passed!  %%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Furthermore, all GCHP integration tests were zero-diff w/r/t PR #1879:

Checking gchp_merra2_fullchem
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gchp_merra2_fullchem_benchmark
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gchp_merra2_fullchem_RRTMG
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gchp_merra2_tagO3
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts

Checking gchp_merra2_TransportTracers
   -> No differences in OutputDir
   -> No differences in Restarts
``

[lizziel]

Looks good. I generally leave the initial version line for the revision history to give the original author credit, and to see when the file originated at a glance. The GitHub history wouldn't have this as the original commit since HEMCO used to be in the GEOS-Chem repo. But I think it's okay to merge this anyway.

Sorry I missed in my other review that there was another file that needed the changes!