Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature: use pydantic validators for message checks #27

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2024

Conversation

gounux
Copy link
Collaborator

@gounux gounux commented Jul 28, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.02%. Comparing base (22ee374) to head (57a61ca).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #27      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.25%   92.02%   -1.23%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         163      138      -25     
  Branches       22       15       -7     
==========================================
- Hits          152      127      -25     
  Misses          7        7              
  Partials        4        4              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 92.02% <100.00%> (-1.23%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@Guts Guts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good move!

@gounux gounux merged commit 8c59d07 into main Jul 29, 2024
6 checks passed
@gounux gounux deleted the feature/use-pydantic-validators branch July 29, 2024 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants