Add Setup tests (test automation) #2380
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes encompass various modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on improving code consistency, enhancing functionality, and updating test setups. Key updates include adjustments to feature descriptions and titles for consistency, enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (29)
tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts (1)
22-23: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for new environment variables.The addition of
ATTRIBUTE_IDandTAG_IDas string types to theProcessEnvinterface is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions. These new environment variables will likely be useful for working with attributes and tags in the system.Consider adding inline documentation comments for these new environment variables to explain their purpose and expected values. This would be helpful for developers who might use these variables in the future. For example:
/** ID of the attribute used in tests */ ATTRIBUTE_ID: string; /** ID of the tag used in tests */ TAG_ID: string;tests/pw/tests/api/_env.setup.ts (4)
Line range hint
33-57: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the shipping class creation.The changes to this setup function are well-structured and align with the expanded scope indicated by the updated function name. The addition of shipping class creation enhances the test environment setup.
Consider adding a brief comment before line 57 to explain the purpose of creating a shipping class, similar to the existing comments for other sections within this function. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
74-87: LGTM! Consider using consistent variable naming for category IDs.The changes to this setup function are well-structured and provide a more comprehensive setup for categories. The addition of different category types enhances the test data variety.
For consistency, consider capturing and storing the IDs of the newly created categories (electronics and multi-step) in environment variables, similar to how it's done for the first category. This would make these IDs easily accessible for future tests if needed.
89-98: LGTM! Consider using a loop for creating attribute terms.The addition of a separate setup function for attributes improves code organization and modularity. The function follows a clear structure and enhances the test environment setup.
Consider using a loop to create attribute terms, which would make the code more concise and easier to maintain. Here's an example:
const terms = ['s', 'l', 'm']; for (const term of terms) { await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(attributeId, { name: term }); }This approach would make it easier to add or modify terms in the future.
100-107: LGTM! Consider parameterizing the tag creation.The addition of a separate setup function for tags improves code organization and enhances the completeness of the test environment. The function follows a clear structure and stores the tag ID for future reference.
To improve flexibility, consider parameterizing the tag creation process. This would allow for easier creation of multiple tags if needed in the future. Here's an example:
const tagsToCreate = [payloads.createTag]; for (const tagPayload of tagsToCreate) { const [, tagId] = await apiUtils.createTag(tagPayload); helpers.createEnvVar(`TAG_ID_${tagPayload.name}`, tagId); }This approach would make it easier to add more tags in the future without modifying the function structure.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (3)
Line range hint
33-57: Improved shipping setup function looks good!The renaming and expansion of the shipping setup function to include shipping class creation is a positive change. It provides a more comprehensive setup for testing shipping-related features.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of line 37 (
// allShippingZoneIds = helpers.removeItem(allShippingZoneIds, 0) // avoid remove default zone id). If this commented-out code is no longer needed, it might be better to remove it entirely to avoid confusion.
74-87: Improved category setup function looks good!The renaming of the function to focus solely on categories and the addition of multi-step category creation are positive changes. This improves the organization of the setup process and enhances test coverage.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining what a "multi-step category" is and why it's important for testing. This would improve the code's self-documentation.
101-109: New tag setup function is a valuable addition!The creation of a separate function for setting up tags further improves the organization of the setup process. The deletion of previous tags before creating a new one ensures a consistent starting point for tests.
Consider creating multiple tags instead of just one. This would provide a more comprehensive setup for testing tag-related features and edge cases.
tests/pw/utils/helpers.ts (3)
314-316: Improved error handling in readJson functionThe
readJsonfunction now logs a message when a file is not found and returnsnull. This change improves error handling and debugging.However, consider using a more robust logging mechanism (e.g., a dedicated logger) instead of
console.logfor better control over log levels in different environments.Consider replacing
console.logwith a more flexible logging solution:import { logger } from './logger'; // Assume a logger is implemented // In the readJson function } else { logger.warn(`File not found: ${filePath}`); return null; }
435-453: New function added: isCookieValidThe
isCookieValidfunction is a good addition for checking the validity of login cookies. It correctly reads the cookie file, checks for the presence of a login cookie, and compares the expiry date.However, there are a few suggestions for improvement:
- Consider using a more robust logging mechanism instead of
console.log.- The function could be more concise by combining some of the checks.
- Consider adding error handling for potential JSON parsing errors.
Here's a suggested refactoring of the function:
isCookieValid(filePath: string): boolean { try { const cookies = this.readJson(filePath); const loginCookie = cookies?.cookies?.find((cookie: { name: string }) => cookie.name.startsWith('wordpress_logged_in')); if (!loginCookie) { logger.warn('No valid login cookie found.'); return false; } const cookieExpiryDate = new Date(loginCookie.expires * 1000); const isValid = cookieExpiryDate > new Date(); logger.info(`Cookie expiry: ${cookieExpiryDate.toLocaleDateString('en-CA')}, Is valid: ${isValid}`); return isValid; } catch (error) { logger.error(`Error checking cookie validity: ${error}`); return false; } }This refactored version combines checks, uses a hypothetical
loggerfor better logging, and includes error handling.
Line range hint
1-502: Overall assessment: Positive improvements to the helpers objectThe changes made to the
helpers.tsfile generally improve its functionality and usability. New functions likekebabCaseandisCookieValidadd valuable utilities, while updates to existing functions likeaddDaysandreadJsonenhance their flexibility and error handling.To further improve the code:
- Consider implementing a consistent logging mechanism throughout the file.
- Review error handling strategies, particularly for functions that interact with the file system or parse JSON.
- Consider adding unit tests for the new and modified functions to ensure their correctness and prevent regressions.
tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
101-101: Comprehensive update required for product category handlingThe changes to the
product.categoryinterface represent a significant shift in how product categories are handled in the system. This update allows for multiple categories per product but also removes therandomCategory1method.To ensure system-wide consistency and functionality, please consider the following actions:
- Update all components that display product categories to handle multiple categories.
- Modify any filtering or search functionality to work with the new multi-category structure.
- Adjust database schemas and API endpoints to support multiple categories per product.
- Update documentation to reflect the new multi-category capability.
- Review and update unit tests and integration tests related to product categories.
- If random category selection is still needed, implement a new utility function that works with the array of categories.
These changes may have a wide-ranging impact on the system. It's recommended to perform a thorough review of all product-related functionality to ensure everything works correctly with the new category structure.
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (8)
Line range hint
1-4: The locators object is well-structured but could benefit from some improvements.The overall organization of the
locatorsobject into admin, vendor, and customer sections is good. However, the file is very large and might become difficult to maintain as it grows. Consider splitting this into multiple files, one for each main section (admin, vendor, customer) to improve maintainability.
Line range hint
6-36: Consider using more descriptive names for some locators.While many locators have clear names, some could be more descriptive. For example,
vRegistrationcould bevendorRegistrationfor better clarity. Also, consider using a consistent naming convention throughout the file.
Line range hint
38-100: Some locators use complex XPath selectors which might be fragile.For example, the XPath selector on line 98:
crop: '//div[@class="supports-drag-drop" and @style="position: relative;"]//button[contains(@class, "media-button-insert")]',This selector is quite specific and might break if the HTML structure changes slightly. Consider using more robust selectors where possible, perhaps by adding specific data attributes to elements for testing purposes.
Line range hint
102-200: There's potential for refactoring repeated patterns in selectors.Many selectors follow similar patterns, especially in the admin section. Consider creating helper functions to generate these selectors to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Line range hint
202-300: Some comments indicate TODOs or potential updates needed.For example, on line 285:
// todo: add booking checkThese TODO comments should be addressed to ensure all necessary locators are implemented.
Line range hint
302-400: Consider adding type annotations for better TypeScript support.While the locators object is implicitly typed, adding explicit type annotations could improve code quality and developer experience.
Line range hint
402-500: Some locators use numeric indices which might be fragile.For example, on line 450:
firstModuleCheckbox: '(//div[@class="module-checkbox"]//input)[1]',Using numeric indices in selectors can be fragile if the structure of the page changes. Consider using more specific attributes or data-testid attributes for these elements.
Line range hint
502-3500: The file is very large and might benefit from modularization.With over 3000 lines of code, this file is quite large and might be difficult to navigate and maintain. Consider splitting it into smaller, more focused files, perhaps one for each major section of the application.
tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts (6)
346-349: Consider making the timeout configurable inclickIfVisibleIn
clickIfVisible, theisVisiblemethod is called with a hardcoded timeout of1second:await this.isVisible(selector, 1);. This may not be sufficient in all scenarios, especially in environments with varying performance. Consider making the timeout configurable or using a default value that accommodates different conditions.- const isVisible = await this.isVisible(selector, 1); + const isVisible = await this.isVisible(selector, timeout);
477-477: Remove commented-out code to improve maintainabilityThe commented-out
await this.wait(...)lines can clutter the code and reduce readability. If these waits are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the codebase clean.// In the focus method - // await this.wait(1); // for visualizing the focus // In the hover method - // await this.wait(0.2);Also applies to: 483-483
756-759: Remove commented-out code and ensure method consistencyIn the
checkmethod, theawait this.checkByPage(selector);line is commented out. If it's no longer necessary due to the addedcheckLocatorandtoBeCheckedcalls, consider removing it to maintain code clarity.// added to remove flakiness await this.checkLocator(selector); await this.toBeChecked(selector, { timeout: 200 }); - // await this.checkByPage(selector);
1412-1419: Remove commented-out code inclickMultiplemethodIn the
clickMultiplemethod, theawait this.toPass(async () => { ... });block is commented out. If this error handling is no longer needed, consider removing the commented code to keep the codebase clean.async clickMultiple(selector: string): Promise<void> { for (const element of await this.page.locator(selector).all()) { - // await this.toPass(async () => { await element.click(); - // }); } }
Line range hint
1730-1739: Replaceconsole.logstatements with proper logging mechanismsUsing
console.logmay not be suitable for test automation logs. Consider replacingconsole.logwith a logging utility or removing these statements if not necessary.if (uploadedMediaIsVisible) { await this.click(selector.wpMedia.uploadedMediaFirst); - console.log('File Already Uploaded'); } else { await this.click(selector.wpMedia.uploadFiles); await this.uploadFile(selector.wpMedia.selectFilesInput, file); - console.log('File Uploaded'); }
1730-1730: Avoid hardcoded timeout values; make them configurableThe timeout value
3inawait this.isVisible(selector.wpMedia.uploadedMediaFirst, 3);is hardcoded. Consider defining it as a constant or parameter to improve flexibility and readability.- const uploadedMediaIsVisible = await this.isVisible(selector.wpMedia.uploadedMediaFirst, 3); + const timeout = 3; + const uploadedMediaIsVisible = await this.isVisible(selector.wpMedia.uploadedMediaFirst, timeout);tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (2)
459-462: Consider generalizing the payload type increateAttributeBy specifying the payload type as
{ name: string }, the method is restricted to payloads that only include anameproperty. If additional properties are needed in the future, consider defining a more general interface or using a broader type to accommodate extra fields.
Line range hint
1659-1678: Incorrect header keyContentTypeshould beContent-TypeIn the
uploadMediamethod, the HTTP headerContentTypeshould beContent-Type. Using the incorrect header key may lead to the server misinterpreting the content type.Apply this diff to fix the header key:
headers: { Accept: '*/*', - ContentType: 'multipart/form-data', + 'Content-Type': 'multipart/form-data', Authorization: auth.Authorization, },tests/pw/utils/payloads.ts (1)
281-285: Remove unnecessary commented-out codeThe code from lines 281 to 285 is commented out. If it is no longer needed, consider removing it to improve code readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to clean up the code:
- // { - // key: '_dokan_min_max_meta', - // value: { - // min_quantity: 4, - // max_quantity: 5, - // }, - // },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
tests/pw/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (6 hunks)
- tests/pw/package.json (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts (17 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/loginPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/singleProductPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorPage.ts (0 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/api/_env.setup.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/wholesale.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/types/environment.d.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (13 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/helpers.ts (5 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/payloads.ts (8 hunks)
- tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- tests/pw/pages/vendorPage.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/shortcodes.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments not posted (34)
tests/pw/package.json (1)
62-62: Please clarify the rationale for downgrading TypeScript.The TypeScript version has been downgraded from
^5.6.2to^5.5.4. While this might resolve specific compatibility issues, it's generally recommended to use the latest stable version for security updates and new features.
- Could you explain the reason for this downgrade? Are there any specific compatibility issues with version 5.6.x?
- Have you verified that this version is compatible with other dependencies and tools in the project, especially considering that other dependencies (like @playwright/test) are using their latest versions?
- If this downgrade is necessary, please consider adding a comment in the
package.jsonfile or in the project documentation explaining the reason for using this specific version.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following command to check for any TypeScript-related warnings or errors:
This will run the TypeScript compiler in type-checking mode and highlight any potential issues introduced by this version change.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/wholesale.spec.ts (1)
104-104: Verify impact of usingcreateProductRequiredFieldspayloadThe change from
payloads.createProduct()topayloads.createProductRequiredFields()for product creation is noted. This modification potentially streamlines the test setup by focusing on essential product attributes.However, please consider the following:
- Verify that subsequent tests in this file (particularly the "vendor can create wholesale product" test) are not dependent on any non-required fields that might have been present in the previous payload.
- Ensure that this change aligns with the PR objectives for improving test automation.
- Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale for using only required fields in this context.
To assist in verifying the impact, you can run the following script:
tests/pw/tests/e2e/_env.setup.ts (2)
89-100: New attribute setup function is a good addition!The creation of a separate function for setting up attributes improves the organization of the setup process. The deletion of previous attributes before creating new ones ensures a consistent starting point for tests.
This change aligns well with the principle of separation of concerns and should make the setup process more maintainable.
Line range hint
33-109: Overall, these changes significantly improve the test setup processThe modifications to the setup functions for shipping, categories, attributes, and tags demonstrate a commitment to improving the organization and comprehensiveness of the test environment. By separating concerns and adding more detailed setup steps, these changes should lead to more reliable and thorough testing of the e-commerce system.
These improvements align well with best practices in test automation and should make the codebase more maintainable and easier to work with in the long run.
tests/pw/utils/helpers.ts (3)
63-69: LGTM: Kebab case conversion function addedThe
kebabCasefunction is a good addition to the helpers object. It correctly handles the conversion of strings to kebab case, including handling of camelCase, spaces, and underscores.
114-114: Improved documentation for currentDateThe comment for
currentDatehas been updated to clearly specify the date format as [YY-MM-DD]. This improvement in documentation helps developers understand the expected output format.
129-129: Improved flexibility: Optional format parameter in addDays functionThe
addDaysfunction has been updated to make theformatparameter optional with a default value of 'default'. This change enhances the function's usability while maintaining backwards compatibility.tests/pw/utils/interfaces.ts (1)
101-101: LGTM with follow-up tasksThe changes to the
product.categoryinterface in this file look good and provide more flexibility for handling product categories. The shift from a single category to multiple categories is a positive improvement.To ensure a smooth transition, please:
- Update all related components and functions to work with the new array structure for categories.
- Remove any usage of the deleted
randomCategory1method.- Consider adding a utility function for random category selection if still needed.
- Update tests to reflect these changes.
Run the following script to help identify areas that might need updates:
Review the results and make necessary adjustments throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
**Verification Complete **
All usages of
product.category.categoriesand the removal ofrandomCategory1have been successfully updated across the codebase. No additional issues were found related to these changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for product category related code rg --type typescript --type javascript -e 'product\.category\.categories' -e 'randomCategory1'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for product category related code in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type ts --type js -e 'product\.category\.categories' -e 'randomCategory1'Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive search for product.category usage in TypeScript and JavaScript files rg --type ts --type js -e 'product\.category(\.categories)?' -e 'randomCategory1' -A 2 # Using ast-grep to find interfaces or types that extend or use product.category ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'interface $_ extends product.category { $$$ }'Length of output: 4033
tests/pw/utils/testData.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-1458: Well-structured test data file.This file serves as a comprehensive repository for test data and configurations. It's well-organized, grouping related data together, which facilitates maintenance and usage across various tests. The structure allows for easy updates and additions as new features or test scenarios are developed.
Consider the following suggestions to further improve the file:
- Add comments to describe the purpose of each major section.
- Consider breaking down very large objects into smaller, more manageable pieces if the file becomes too large.
- Implement a versioning system for the test data to track changes over time.
Line range hint
1-1458: Summary of changes and overall file quality.The changes in this file are minimal but potentially impactful:
- Updated category data structure and content.
- Modified file paths for banner and profile picture.
These changes maintain the overall high quality and organization of the test data. However, they may require updates to existing tests that rely on the modified data or file paths.
Action items:
- Update any tests or code that use the modified category structure or file paths.
- Run a comprehensive test suite to ensure these changes haven't introduced any regressions.
- Consider adding a changelog to the file to track future modifications more easily.
1118-1119: Updated file paths for banner and profile picture.The paths for
bannerandprofilePicturehave been simplified:
banner: 'utils/sampleData/banner.png'profilePicture: 'utils/sampleData/avatar.png'This change suggests a reorganization of the sample data file structure. Ensure that:
- The new paths are correct and the files exist in the specified locations.
- All tests and code that use these paths are updated accordingly.
Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the old file paths:
#!/bin/bash # Search for old and new file paths echo "Searching for old file paths:" rg "tests/e2e/utils/sampleData/(banner|avatar)\.png" --type typescript echo "Searching for new file paths:" rg "utils/sampleData/(banner|avatar)\.png" --type typescript
182-185: Changes to category data structure and content.The modifications in this section include:
- Changing 'Clothings' to lowercase 'clothings'.
- Replacing the dynamic category selection with a static array.
- Adding a new
multistepCategoriesproperty.These changes may affect existing tests that rely on the previous data structure. Ensure that all related tests are updated accordingly.
To verify the impact of these changes, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Category data structure changes are localized and verified.
The review concerns have been verified with the following findings:
- Old dynamic category selection (
faker.helpers.arrayElement(['Clothings', ...])) is not used elsewhere in the codebase.- New static category array (
categories: ['clothings', 'electronics']) andmultistepCategories(['gadgets', 'Wearables', 'smartwatches', 'fitness-trackers']) are only present intests/pw/utils/testData.ts.These changes are confined to
testData.ts, ensuring that existing tests are updated accordingly without affecting other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the old and new category structures echo "Searching for old dynamic category selection:" rg "faker\.helpers\.arrayElement\(\[.*?'Clothings'.*?\]\)" --type typescript echo "Searching for new static category array usage:" rg "categories: \['clothings', 'electronics'\]" --type typescript echo "Searching for new multistepCategories usage:" rg "multistepCategories: \['gadgets', 'Wearables', 'smartwatches', 'fitness-trackers'\]" --type typescriptLength of output: 725
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the old dynamic category selection in TypeScript files echo "Searching for old dynamic category selection:" rg "faker\.helpers\.arrayElement\(\[.*?'Clothings'.*?\]\)" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Search for usages of the new static category array in TypeScript files echo "Searching for new static category array usage:" rg "categories: \['clothings', 'electronics'\]" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Search for usages of the new multistepCategories in TypeScript files echo "Searching for new multistepCategories usage:" rg "multistepCategories: \['gadgets', 'Wearables', 'smartwatches', 'fitness-trackers'\]" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 836
tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts (12)
449-450: Method signature update enhances flexibilityThe
isEnabledmethod now accepts an optionaloptionsparameter, providing additional flexibility for stricter checks or custom timeouts.
707-707: Updated to use locator API for filling input fieldsUsing
this.page.locator(selector).fill(text)enhances the specificity and reliability of element targeting. This change improves the robustness of theclearAndFillandfillmethods.Also applies to: 717-717
1073-1076: Addition ofgetFirstLocatormethodThe
getFirstLocatormethod provides a convenient way to obtain the first matching locator for a selector, enhancing code readability and usability.
1381-1384: Addition ofclickFirstLocatormethodThe
clickFirstLocatormethod adds the capability to click the first matching element, which enhances interaction flexibility and simplifies code when dealing with multiple elements.
1459-1462: Addition oftoBeDisabledassertion methodThe
toBeDisabledmethod enhances the assertion capabilities by allowing verification of disabled elements, improving test coverage.
1495-1495: UpdatetoHaveAttributemethod to acceptRegExpvaluesThe
toHaveAttributemethod now accepts astringorRegExpfor thevalueparameter, enhancing the flexibility of attribute value assertions.
1499-1504: Addition oftoHaveClassandtoHaveSelectedValueassertion methodsThe
toHaveClassandtoHaveSelectedValuemethods enhance assertion capabilities, allowing verification of element classes and selected values. This improves the robustness and expressiveness of the test assertions.
1512-1518: Addition oftoHaveSelectedLabelassertion methodThe
toHaveSelectedLabelmethod allows for asserting that a select element has a specific selected label, enhancing the assertion capabilities for form elements.
1565-1568: Addition ofnotToBeCheckedassertion methodThe
notToBeCheckedmethod enables assertions that elements are not checked, enhancing test coverage for unchecked states.
1604-1609: Addition oftoBeCheckedMultiplemethodThe
toBeCheckedMultiplemethod asserts that multiple elements matching the selector are checked, improving test coverage for batch elements.
1749-1749: Ensuring optional interaction with the crop buttonUsing
await this.clickIfVisible(selector.wpMedia.crop);ensures that the code gracefully handles cases where the crop button may or may not be present, enhancing robustness.
1740-1746: Handle missing lines and ensure code consistencyThere appears to be a missing line number (1744) in the code provided. Ensure that the code block is complete and consistent to prevent potential errors during execution.
To verify the code consistency, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Missing lines verification successful
No missing lines detected in
tests/pw/pages/basePage.tsbetween lines 1740 and 1746.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for missing line numbers in the provided code fragment. # Test: Ensure that there are no gaps in line numbering. # Expected result: Lines should increment sequentially without missing numbers. awk '/^[0-9]+~/{line=substr($0,1,index($0,"~")-1); if(line!=prev+1){print "Missing line between "prev" and "line}; prev=line}' codeFragment.tsLength of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify there are no missing lines between 1740 and 1746 in tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts. # Extract lines 1740-1746 sed -n '1740,1746p' tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts > extractedLines.ts # Check if the number of lines is exactly 7 (inclusive) line_count=$(wc -l < extractedLines.ts) if [ "$line_count" -ne 7 ]; then echo "Missing lines detected in tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts between lines 1740 and 1746." else echo "No missing lines detected in tests/pw/pages/basePage.ts between lines 1740 and 1746." fiLength of output: 267
tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (2)
354-357: LGTMThe
updateProductmethod is consistent with existing patterns and correctly implements the update functionality for products.
1895-1901: Validateactionparameter inupdateBatchTagsThe
actionparameter is used directly in the data object sent to the API. If an invalid action is passed, it could cause unexpected behavior. Consider validating theactionagainst allowed values.You can add validation like this:
const allowedActions = ['create', 'update', 'delete']; if (!allowedActions.includes(action)) { throw new Error(`Invalid action: ${action}`); }tests/pw/utils/payloads.ts (8)
1085-1086: Approve the category name updateThe category name is updated to
'clothings'. This change is acceptable as long as it aligns with your category naming conventions.
1088-1090: Add new categorycreateCategoryElectronicsThe new category
'electronics'is added. Ensure that this category is correctly configured elsewhere in the codebase if needed.
1112-1114: Approve the addition of new tagcreateTagThe new tag
'accessories'is added to the payloads. This addition is acceptable and enhances testing coverage.
1584-1587: Approve the addition ofcreateShippingClassAdding a new shipping class
'heavy'with the description'Shipping class for heavy products'is appropriate for testing shipping functionalities.
1589-1593: Approve the addition ofcreateRandomShippingClassThe
createRandomShippingClassfunction generates shipping classes with random names. This is useful for creating dynamic test data.
1729-1732: Approve the addition ofcreateTaxClassA new tax class with slug
'zero-rate'and name'Zero Rate'is added. Ensure that this tax class is properly configured in your test environment.
1096-1096: Verify thecreateMultiStepCategoryarrayA new multi-step category creation array is introduced with categories
'gadgets','wearables','smartwatches', and'fitness-trackers'. Please verify that these categories exist or are created properly during tests.You can run the following script to check for existing definitions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the categories exist in the codebase rg --type ts --type js 'name: \'gadgets\'|name: \'wearables\'|name: \'smartwatches\'|name: \'fitness-trackers\''
7-7: Ensure new environment variables are defined and used appropriatelyThe environment variables
PRODUCT_ID_V2,CATEGORY_ID,TAG_ID, andATTRIBUTE_IDhave been added. Please verify that these variables are correctly set in your environment and are used appropriately in the codebase to avoidundefinederrors.You can run the following script to check where these variables are used:
| @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ export class LoginPage extends BasePage { | |||
| // login user | |||
| await this.clearAndType(selector.frontend.username, user.username); | |||
| await this.clearAndType(selector.frontend.userPassword, user.password); | |||
| await this.check(selector.frontend.rememberMe); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider making the "Remember Me" checkbox optional in the login process
The addition of await this.check(selector.frontend.rememberMe); ensures that the "Remember Me" checkbox is always checked during the login process. While this improves test coverage, it might not accurately reflect real-world usage patterns and could potentially mask issues related to the "Remember Me" functionality.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Make the "Remember Me" checkbox optional by adding a parameter to the
loginFrontendmethod. - Create separate test cases for login with and without the "Remember Me" option checked.
Here's a proposed modification to make the "Remember Me" checkbox optional:
async loginFrontend(user: user, storageState?: string, rememberMe: boolean = false): Promise<void> {
// ... existing code ...
if (rememberMe) {
await this.check(selector.frontend.rememberMe);
}
// ... rest of the existing code ...
}This change allows for more flexible testing scenarios and better mimics real-world user behavior.
| // await this.multipleElementVisible(singleProductCustomer.location); //todo: need to resolve: product location gets reset by other tests, skipeed for now | ||
| await this.toBeVisible(singleProductCustomer.location.map); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Acknowledge the workaround and suggest improvements
The change addresses a known issue where the product location gets reset by other tests. While this workaround allows the tests to proceed, it's important to address the root cause and improve the test's robustness.
- Create a task to investigate and fix the underlying issue of product location being reset by other tests.
- Enhance the comment to provide more context:
// TODO: Investigate and fix the issue of product location being reset by other tests.
// Temporary workaround: Only checking for map visibility instead of all location elements.
// await this.multipleElementVisible(singleProductCustomer.location);
await this.toBeVisible(singleProductCustomer.location.map);- Consider a more robust solution:
- Implement test isolation to prevent tests from affecting each other.
- Add a setup step to ensure the product location is correctly set before each test.
- If possible, mock the location data to ensure consistency across tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (6)
459-462: LGTM: ImprovedcreateAttributemethod signatureThe updates to the
createAttributemethod enhance type safety and provide more information to the caller. The more specific payload type and the additional return value are good improvements.Consider destructuring the
payloadparameter to make it clear which properties are required:async createAttribute({ name }: { name: string }, auth?: auth): Promise<[responseBody, string, string]>This change would make the required properties even more explicit at the function signature level.
491-504: LGTM: EnhancedcreateAttributeTermmethod with improved flexibility and return valuesThe updates to the
createAttributeTermmethod are good improvements. The method now handles different input types for theattributeparameter and provides more detailed return values.Consider the following improvements:
- Use type guards to improve type safety:
if (typeof attribute === 'object' && attribute !== null) { // ... }
- Add error handling for the case when
attributeis neither an object nor a string:if (typeof attribute !== 'object' && typeof attribute !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid attribute type'); }
- Consider using a more specific type for the
attributeparameter to make the expected input clearer:async createAttributeTerm( attribute: { name: string } | string, attributeTerm: { name: string }, auth?: auth ): Promise<[responseBody, string, string, string, string]>These changes would further enhance the type safety and robustness of the method.
1857-1864: LGTM: NewcreateMultiStepCategorymethod addedThe new
createMultiStepCategorymethod is a valuable addition, allowing for the creation of nested category hierarchies. The implementation is straightforward and effective.Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling to manage potential failures in category creation:
async createMultiStepCategory(multiStepCategories: string[], auth?: auth): Promise<void> { let parentCategoryId = '0'; for (const category of multiStepCategories) { try { const [, categoryId] = await this.createCategory({ name: category, parent: parentCategoryId }, auth); parentCategoryId = categoryId; } catch (error) { console.error(`Failed to create category ${category}:`, error); throw error; // or handle the error as appropriate for your use case } } }
- Consider returning the ID of the last created category, which could be useful for callers:
async createMultiStepCategory(multiStepCategories: string[], auth?: auth): Promise<string> { // ... implementation ... return parentCategoryId; }These changes would enhance the robustness and utility of the method.
Line range hint
1868-1902: LGTM: New tag-related methods addedThe addition of
getAllTags,getSingleTag,getTagId, andupdateBatchTagsmethods provides comprehensive functionality for managing tags. These methods are implemented consistently with other similar methods in the class.For the
getTagIdmethod, consider adding error handling for the case when no matching tag is found:async getTagId(tagName: string, auth?: auth): Promise<string> { const allTags = await this.getAllTags(auth); const tagId = allTags.find((o: { name: string }) => o.name.toLowerCase() === tagName.toLowerCase())?.id; if (!tagId) { throw new Error(`Tag not found: ${tagName}`); } return tagId; }This change would make the method more robust by explicitly handling the case where the requested tag doesn't exist.
1913-1918: LGTM: NewcreateProductWcmethod addedThe new
createProductWcmethod is a good addition, providing a way to create products using the WooCommerce API. The method is implemented consistently with other methods in the class and returns useful information.Consider adding error handling to manage potential API errors:
async createProductWc(payload: object, auth?: auth): Promise<[responseBody, string, string]> { const [, responseBody] = await this.post(endPoints.wc.createProduct, { data: payload, headers: auth }); if ('code' in responseBody && responseBody.code !== 'success') { throw new Error(`Failed to create product: ${responseBody.message}`); } const productId = String(responseBody?.id); const productName = String(responseBody?.name); return [responseBody, productId, productName]; }This change would make the method more robust by explicitly handling potential errors from the API.
2222-2226: LGTM: NewgetMetaDataValueutility method addedThe new
getMetaDataValuemethod is a useful addition for working with metadata arrays. Its implementation is simple and effective.Consider the following improvements:
- Update the return type for better type safety:
getMetaDataValue<T>(metaDataArray: Array<{ key: string, value: T }>, key: string): T | null { const metaData = metaDataArray.find(item => item.key === key); return metaData?.value ?? null; }
- Remove the
Promise<any>return type as the method is synchronous:getMetaDataValue<T>(metaDataArray: Array<{ key: string, value: T }>, key: string): T | null { // ... implementation ... }These changes would improve type safety and make the method signature more accurate.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (13 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (2)
tests/pw/utils/apiUtils.ts (2)
353-357: LGTM: NewupdateProductmethod addedThe new
updateProductmethod is a well-implemented addition to theApiUtilsclass. It follows the established pattern of other methods in the class, uses proper TypeScript typing, and returns the response body as expected.
Line range hint
1660-1679: LGTM:uploadMediamethod now returns source URLThe update to the
uploadMediamethod is a good improvement. By including thesource_urlin the return value, it provides more useful information to the caller without requiring an additional API call to retrieve this data.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
BasePageclass.Bug Fixes
Chores