Add: add product form tests (wholesale, min-max) #2397
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes significant modifications to the feature map configuration for a plugin, affecting user role permissions across various pages. Key changes involve restricting admin capabilities related to the Dokan plugin while enhancing vendor functionalities, particularly in product management. New methods have been added to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (3)
493-509: LGTM: Min-max options tests are comprehensive, but there's a minor typo.The new tests for min-max options provide good coverage, including add, update, remove operations, and a validation test. They follow the existing testing pattern in the file.
However, there's a small typo in the test description on line 503:
- test("vendor can't add product min limit grater than max limit", { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => { + test("vendor can't add product min limit greater than max limit", { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => {
511-512: Consider creating issues for the TODO items.The TODO comments for advertising and rank math SEO tests are good reminders for future work. To ensure these don't get overlooked, consider creating GitHub issues to track these tasks.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues for these TODO items?
513-513: Consider prioritizing variation options tests.The TODO comment for variation options tests is crucial, as product variations are an important feature. Given its significance, it might be beneficial to prioritize implementing these tests.
Would you like assistance in drafting the test cases for product variation options? I can help outline the key scenarios to cover.
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-1587: Consider refactoring this large class for better maintainability.While the individual methods are generally well-implemented, this file is quite long (1587 lines). This can make it difficult to navigate and maintain. Consider the following suggestions:
Split this large class into smaller, more focused classes. For example, you could have separate classes for different types of products or different aspects of product management.
Use composition to combine these smaller classes into a larger
ProductsPageclass if necessary.Move common utility functions to a separate utility file to reduce duplication and improve reusability.
Consider using a design pattern like Page Object Model more strictly to separate the page structure from the actions performed on the page.
Add more comments explaining the purpose of each method and any non-obvious logic.
These changes could significantly improve the maintainability and readability of your test code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/requestForQuoteRules.spec.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/requestForQuoteRules.spec.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1)
479-491: LGTM: Wholesale options tests are well-structured and comprehensive.The new tests for wholesale options cover the essential operations (add, update, remove) and follow the existing testing pattern in the file. They provide good coverage for this feature.
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (4)
202-208: LGTM! New vendor capabilities for wholesale and min-max options.The added features align well with the PR objectives. They provide vendors with the ability to add, update, and remove wholesale options and min-max options for their products. This enhancement will allow for more flexible pricing strategies.
To ensure these new features are properly implemented, let's verify the corresponding code changes:
Line range hint
1090-1118: LGTM! Comprehensive EU compliance fields implementation.The new features provide a robust EU compliance system:
- Admins can enable/disable EU compliance fields for vendors and customers, manage Germanized support, and control invoice number permissions.
- Vendors can add and update EU compliance data for their stores and products.
- Customers can add and view EU compliance data during registration, checkout, and on product/store pages.
While not directly mentioned in the PR objectives, these changes are crucial for ensuring regulatory compliance in the EU market.
Consider adding a brief mention of the EU compliance fields addition to the PR description, as it's a significant feature that wasn't initially highlighted.
Let's verify the implementation of these EU compliance features:
✅ Verification successful
EU Compliance Features Verified
EU compliance features are properly implemented in
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml. The relevant entries are present and correctly configured.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the implementation of EU compliance features # Test: Search for EU compliance-related functions or methods echo "Searching for EU compliance-related implementations:" rg --type php -i "function.*eu.*compliance" # Test: Search for Germanized support implementations echo "Searching for Germanized support implementations:" rg --type php -i "function.*germanized" # Test: Search for invoice number permission implementations echo "Searching for invoice number permission implementations:" rg --type php -i "function.*invoice.*number.*permission"Length of output: 493
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify EU compliance feature implementations in the YAML configuration # Locate the feature-map.yml file echo "Locating feature-map.yml file:" fd feature-map.yml # Check if the file exists if [ ! -f tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml ]; then echo "feature-map.yml not found." exit 1 fi # Display the lines 199-211 from feature-map.yml echo "Displaying lines 199-211 from feature-map.yml:" sed -n '199,211p' tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml # Search for EU compliance-related keywords within feature-map.yml echo "Searching for EU compliance-related entries in feature-map.yml:" rg -i "eu compliance" tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml echo "Searching for 'germanized' support in feature-map.yml:" rg -i "germanized" tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml echo "Searching for 'invoice number permission' in feature-map.yml:" rg -i "invoice number permission" tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.ymlLength of output: 4285
Line range hint
1180-1196: LGTM! Comprehensive wholesale system implementation.The new features provide a robust wholesale system:
- Admins can manage wholesale customers, including searching, enabling/disabling capabilities, editing, and viewing orders.
- Vendors can create wholesale products.
- Customers can become wholesale customers and request wholesale status.
- Wholesale pricing visibility is controlled based on user roles.
These changes align well with the PR objectives and enhance the overall functionality of the system.
Let's verify the implementation of these wholesale features:
Line range hint
1000-1001: LGTM! Enhanced admin controls for vendor subscriptions.The new features allow admins to cancel subscriptions either immediately or at the end of the current period. This provides more flexibility in managing vendor subscriptions.
Let's verify the implementation of these new subscription cancellation features:
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (2)
1550-1555: TheremoveProductWholesaleOptionsmethod looks good.The method correctly unchecks the wholesale option and verifies that it's not checked after saving. It follows the pattern used in other similar methods in this class.
1558-1565: TheaddProductMinMaxOptionsmethod is implemented correctly.This method sets the minimum and maximum quantity for a product and verifies the values after saving. It follows the established pattern in the class.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests