Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 30, 2023. It is now read-only.

added event processors to scope #209

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2020
Merged

Conversation

marandaneto
Copy link
Contributor

📢 Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactoring

📜 Description

added event processors to scope

💡 Motivation and Context

the current scope doesn't support event processors, but it's part of the unified API.

💚 How did you test it?

unit tests.

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed submitted code
  • I added tests to verify changes
  • All tests passing

🔮 Next steps

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 8, 2020

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@d8c4ee8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #209   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   58.76%           
  Complexity        ?      570           
=========================================
  Files             ?       73           
  Lines             ?     2646           
  Branches          ?      235           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1555           
  Misses            ?      974           
  Partials          ?      117
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
sentry-core/src/main/java/io/sentry/core/Dsn.java 94.11% <100%> (ø) 12 <0> (?)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d8c4ee8...a19e9b0. Read the comment docs.

@marandaneto marandaneto merged commit c340352 into master Jan 9, 2020
@marandaneto marandaneto deleted the enha/scope_processors branch January 9, 2020 13:22
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants