Use getMyMemoryState() instead of getRunningAppProcesses()

[romtsn]

📜 Description

Use ActivityManager.getMyMemoryState(); instead of ActivityManager.getRunningAppProcesses() to retrieve process importance to prevent some app stores from flagging apps as violating privacies.

The PR is targeting v7 because getMyMemoryState requires API 16, and we bumped it to 19 in v7.

💡 Motivation and Context

Closes #2187

💚 How did you test it?

Automated

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed the submitted code.
• I added tests to verify the changes.
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
• I updated the docs if needed.
• Review from the native team if needed.
• No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
• No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	373.61 ms	453.88 ms	80.27 ms
Size	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.29 KiB

Baseline results on branch: feat/7.0.0

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
6a40795	370.00 ms	437.33 ms	67.33 ms
6684058	414.76 ms	511.46 ms	96.70 ms
db8763d	386.60 ms	453.66 ms	67.06 ms
ff784c6	388.51 ms	461.90 ms	73.39 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
6a40795	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.26 KiB
6684058	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.19 KiB
db8763d	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.22 KiB
ff784c6	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.22 KiB

Previous results on branch: rz/fix/running-processes

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
6bfbb73	400.66 ms	478.04 ms	77.38 ms
422d8cb	375.00 ms	463.92 ms	88.92 ms
e16f9ae	355.59 ms	421.61 ms	66.02 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
6bfbb73	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.29 KiB
422d8cb	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.29 KiB
e16f9ae	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	550.29 KiB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 106 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files	Coverage Δ
...try/android/core/ActivityLifecycleIntegration.java	83.38% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
...a/io/sentry/android/core/AndroidTransportGate.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...roid/core/AppComponentsBreadcrumbsIntegration.java	89.06% <100.00%> (ø)
...o/sentry/android/core/AppLifecycleIntegration.java	68.25% <100.00%> (ø)
...ain/java/io/sentry/android/core/AppStartState.java	97.72% <100.00%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
...try/android/core/DefaultAndroidEventProcessor.java	84.68% <100.00%> (-2.36%)	⬇️
.../android/core/EnvelopeFileObserverIntegration.java	83.33% <100.00%> (+0.57%)	⬆️
...in/java/io/sentry/android/core/NdkIntegration.java	91.83% <100.00%> (ø)
...ry/android/core/NetworkBreadcrumbsIntegration.java	93.93% <100.00%> (ø)
...android/core/PhoneStateBreadcrumbsIntegration.java	84.09% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 74 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

[stefanosiano]

looks good!
Just a couple of suggestions:

1. Good to rename ContextUtilsTest, as it was confusing, but I'd keep the Test word inside the name, so that we know immediately it's only for tests, like ContextUtilsTestHelper
2. There is ContextUtilsUnitTests, which tests ContextUtils. You can merge it inside your newly ContextUtilsTests