-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
feat(astro): Add tracking of errors during HTML streaming #15995
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
AbhiPrasad
merged 2 commits into
getsentry:develop
from
Fryuni:astro/track-streaming-errors
Apr 7, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should still rethrow this error, otherwise we risk breaking people who rely on this.
Is
controller.error(e);
robust enough?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
controller.error
is what rethrows the error on a stream. Throwing from this function is ignored (it was being ignored before, so no one was relying on the error working).The test is checking that the error is being forwarded.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I'm not sure if we want to capture this error at all. The only reason we're even going through the body is to inject our
<meta>
tags and if it's us causing the error by doing so, we shouldn't report it.Or would we even swallow errors if we didn't modify the HTML?
The
try/catch
is probably a good idea anyway to degrade gracefully 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a user thrown error that is being missed and shows as
Internal Server Error
on rendering. I think it makes sense for Sentry to capture and report it, but most of all it makes sense to not drop it and pass it forward so errors from the user are not discarded.We could have some more verbose code to handle only errors from the iterator and not from any part of the
<meta>
tag inside the loop.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed this with @AbhiPrasad offline and for now we think it's fine to leave as-is. The injection is fairly low risk (famous last words lol). In case we get reports about our HTML injection logic causing errors, we can still revisit.
Thanks for contributing!