Skip to content

Conversation

@mydea
Copy link
Member

@mydea mydea commented Sep 13, 2023

This refactors pluggable integrations to use processEvent.

@mydea mydea self-assigned this Sep 13, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 13, 2023

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay) - Webpack (gzipped) 84.26 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing) - Webpack (gzipped) 31.4 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped) 22 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay) - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped) 78.68 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing) - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped) 28.5 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped) 20.59 KB (+0.01% 🔺)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing, Replay) - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified & uncompressed) 254.1 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing) - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified & uncompressed) 86.38 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified & uncompressed) 61.23 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser (incl. Tracing) - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped) 31.38 KB (0%)
@sentry/react (incl. Tracing, Replay) - Webpack (gzipped) 84.27 KB (0%)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped) 22.03 KB (0%)
@sentry/nextjs Client (incl. Tracing, Replay) - Webpack (gzipped) 102.18 KB (-0.02% 🔽)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped) 50.93 KB (-0.04% 🔽)

@mydea mydea force-pushed the fn/integration-processEvent branch from c2d603d to c354494 Compare September 14, 2023 14:42
Base automatically changed from fn/integration-processEvent to develop September 15, 2023 08:07
@mydea mydea force-pushed the fn/integrations-integrations branch 2 times, most recently from 3159fdb to 09b53e6 Compare September 21, 2023 07:26
@mydea mydea force-pushed the fn/integrations-integrations branch from 09b53e6 to 62b438f Compare September 27, 2023 13:56
@mydea mydea force-pushed the fn/integrations-integrations branch from 62b438f to c9d1e40 Compare September 28, 2023 10:02
@mydea mydea marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2023 10:02
@mydea mydea requested a review from AbhiPrasad September 28, 2023 10:02
@krystofwoldrich
Copy link
Contributor

krystofwoldrich commented Jan 4, 2024

I believe we do not guarantee the order of execution of integrations, but anyway, this changed it. Maybe should have been a breaking change?

@mydea
Copy link
Member Author

mydea commented Jan 5, 2024

In theory in places where the execution is important we should use preprocessEvent to ensure it runs before processEvent. For what integration is this important/problematic here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants