Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow setting sdk_name at runtime #834
Allow setting sdk_name at runtime #834
Changes from 4 commits
509ae8a
e0acb2d
4a8863f
83cd946
40f54aa
2a1cffc
8c3a5be
b75d2f9
616311b
8b0e317
97b6bfc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as with options in the scope-private
get_client_sdk
... I would provide a fallback (even though, in this case, this is less probable to happen before the options have been initialized). But maybe we can shift the options access tosentry__curl_transport_start
and add auser_agent
field tocurl_transport_state_s
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that no unit-test screams at this is also problematic. Can you please add assertions for "user-agent" in the unit tests that "cover"
sentry__prepare_http_request()
? Thx!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most
sentry_options_*
tests are intest_basic.c
, but I have no problems with a file focusing explicitly on option initialization.