-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 500
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached #3159
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sl0thentr0py
force-pushed
the
potel-base
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 25, 2024 15:16
16f9341
to
951477f
Compare
sl0thentr0py
force-pushed
the
neel/potel/initial-scope-management
branch
from
June 25, 2024 15:17
e7cbb59
to
4067732
Compare
* create a new otel context `_SCOPES_KEY` that will hold a tuple of `(curent_scope, isolation_scope)` * the `current_scope` will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice) * note that this is on `attach`, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such as [`trace.use_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L547) or [`tracer.start_as_current_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L329) * basically every otel `context` fork corresponds to our `current_scope` fork * the `isolation_scope` currently will not be forked * these will later be updated, for instance when we update our top level scope apis that fork isolation scope, that will also have a corresponding change in this `attach` function
sl0thentr0py
force-pushed
the
neel/potel/initial-scope-management
branch
from
June 25, 2024 15:17
4067732
to
c523182
Compare
sl0thentr0py
force-pushed
the
neel/potel/initial-scope-management
branch
from
June 27, 2024 11:37
9bfab81
to
436626b
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## potel-base #3159 +/- ##
==============================================
- Coverage 79.30% 79.27% -0.04%
==============================================
Files 134 134
Lines 14248 14255 +7
Branches 2989 2990 +1
==============================================
Hits 11300 11300
- Misses 2101 2107 +6
- Partials 847 848 +1
|
sentrivana
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2024
szokeasaurusrex
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 22, 2024
Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached * create a new otel context `_SCOPES_KEY` that will hold a tuple of `(curent_scope, isolation_scope)` * the `current_scope` will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice) * note that this is on `attach`, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such as [`trace.use_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L547) or [`tracer.start_as_current_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L329) * basically every otel `context` fork corresponds to our `current_scope` fork * the `isolation_scope` currently will not be forked * these will later be updated, for instance when we update our top level scope apis that fork isolation scope, that will also have a corresponding change in this `attach` function
sentrivana
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2024
* Skeletons for new components * Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached * create a new otel context `_SCOPES_KEY` that will hold a tuple of `(curent_scope, isolation_scope)` * the `current_scope` will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice) * note that this is on `attach`, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such as [`trace.use_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L547) or [`tracer.start_as_current_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L329) * basically every otel `context` fork corresponds to our `current_scope` fork * the `isolation_scope` currently will not be forked * these will later be updated, for instance when we update our top level scope apis that fork isolation scope, that will also have a corresponding change in this `attach` function * Don't parse DSN twice * wip * Skeletons for new components * Skeletons for new components * Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached * create a new otel context `_SCOPES_KEY` that will hold a tuple of `(curent_scope, isolation_scope)` * the `current_scope` will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice) * note that this is on `attach`, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such as [`trace.use_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L547) or [`tracer.start_as_current_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L329) * basically every otel `context` fork corresponds to our `current_scope` fork * the `isolation_scope` currently will not be forked * these will later be updated, for instance when we update our top level scope apis that fork isolation scope, that will also have a corresponding change in this `attach` function * mypy fixes * working span processor * lint * Port over op/description/status extraction * defaultdict * naive impl * wip * fix args * wip * remove extra docs * Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached (#3159) Add simple scope management whenever a context is attached * create a new otel context `_SCOPES_KEY` that will hold a tuple of `(curent_scope, isolation_scope)` * the `current_scope` will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice) * note that this is on `attach`, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such as [`trace.use_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L547) or [`tracer.start_as_current_span`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-python/blob/ba22b165471bde2037620f2c850ab648a849fbc0/opentelemetry-api/src/opentelemetry/trace/__init__.py#L329) * basically every otel `context` fork corresponds to our `current_scope` fork * the `isolation_scope` currently will not be forked * these will later be updated, for instance when we update our top level scope apis that fork isolation scope, that will also have a corresponding change in this `attach` function * Implement new POTel span processor (#3223) * only acts on `on_end` instead of both `on_start/on_end` as before * store children spans in a dict mapping `span_id -> children` * new dict only stores otel span objects and no sentry transaction/span objects so we save a bit of useless memory allocation * I'm not using our current `Transaction/Span` classes at all to build the event because when we add our APIs later, we'll need to rip these out and we also avoid having to deal with the `instrumenter` problem * if we get a root span (without parent), we recursively walk the dict and find the children and package up the transaction event and send it * I didn't do it like JS because I think this way is better * they [group an array of `finished_spans`](https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-javascript/blob/7e298036a21a5658f3eb9ba184165178c48d7ef8/packages/opentelemetry/src/spanExporter.ts#L132) every time a root span ends and I think this uses more cpu than what I did * and the dict like I used it doesn't take more space than the array either * if we get a span with a parent we just update the dict to find the span later * moved the common `is_sentry_span` logic to utils * Basic test cases for potel (#3286) * Proxy POTelSpan.set_data to underlying otel span attributes (#3297) * ref(tracing): Simplify backwards-compat code (#3379) With this change, we aim to simplify the backwards-compatibility code for POTel tracing. We do this as follows: - Remove `start_*` functions from `tracing` - Remove unused parameters from `tracing.POTelSpan.__init__`. - Make all parameters to `tracing.POTelSpan.__init__` kwarg-only. - Allow `tracing.POTelSpan.__init__` to accept arbitrary kwargs, which are all ignored, for compatibility with old `Span` interface. - Completely remove `start_inactive_span`, since inactive spans can be created by setting `active=False` when constructing a `POTelSpan`. * New Scope implementation based on OTel Context (#3389) * New `PotelScope` inherits from scope and reads the scope from the otel context key `SENTRY_SCOPES_KEY` * New `isolation_scope` and `new_scope` context managers just use the context manager forking and yield with the scopes living on the above context key * isolation scope forking is done with the `SENTRY_FORK_ISOLATION_SCOPE_KEY` boolean context key * Fix circular imports (#3431) * Random tweaks (#3437) * Origin improvements (#3432) * Tweak OTel timestamp utils (#3436) * Create spans on scope (#3442) * Fill out more property/method stubs (#3441) * Cleanup origin handling and defaults (#3445) * add note to migration guide * Attribute namespace for tags, measurements (#3448) --------- Co-authored-by: Neel Shah <neel.shah@sentry.io> Co-authored-by: Neel Shah <neelshah.sa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel Szoke <7881302+szokeasaurusrex@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
_SCOPES_KEY
that will hold a tuple of(curent_scope, isolation_scope)
current_scope
will always be forked (like on every span creation/context update in practice)attach
, so not on all copy-on-write context object creation but only on apis such astrace.use_span
ortracer.start_as_current_span
context
fork corresponds to ourcurrent_scope
forkisolation_scope
currently will not be forkedattach
function