test(tornado): Unpin pytest for tornado tests
#3714
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sl0thentr0py
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2024
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3714 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.29% 84.28% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 133 133
Lines 14260 14260
Branches 2405 2405
==========================================
- Hits 12021 12019 -2
Misses 1490 1490
- Partials 749 751 +2 |
The Pytest version pin is only needed for `tornado-v6.0` and `tornado-v6.2`. The incompatibility with the latest Pytest versions has been fixed in newer Tornado versions.
szokeasaurusrex
force-pushed
the
szokeasaurusrex/unpin-pytest-tornado
branch
from
3d0a92c to
f8810f4
Compare
This was referenced Oct 29, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ref #3035