Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sentry-core: add public getters for TransactionContext #514

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

tommilligan
Copy link
Contributor

@tommilligan tommilligan commented Nov 6, 2022

Split from #512, to enable support for traces_sampler inspecting first class properties of TransactionContext.

This was split as we though the addition of CustomTransactionContext may require further discussion, while these changes should be uncontroversial.

ref: #512 (comment)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #514 (c31fe4a) into master (68c7b64) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #514   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.76%   78.76%           
=======================================
  Files          76       76           
  Lines        9240     9269   +29     
=======================================
+ Hits         7278     7301   +23     
- Misses       1962     1968    +6     

@Turbo87
Copy link
Contributor

Turbo87 commented Nov 10, 2022

@loewenheim is there anything blocking from this getting merged and released? not sure about the process to move this forward :)

@loewenheim loewenheim enabled auto-merge (squash) November 10, 2022 12:02
@loewenheim
Copy link
Contributor

Not at all, I think master just needs to be merged into it :)

@loewenheim loewenheim merged commit 15fc5c1 into getsentry:master Nov 10, 2022
@tommilligan tommilligan deleted the transaction-context-getters branch November 13, 2022 10:39
@Turbo87
Copy link
Contributor

Turbo87 commented Nov 17, 2022

@loewenheim can we help with the release in some way? :)

@loewenheim
Copy link
Contributor

Just started the ball rolling :)

@Turbo87
Copy link
Contributor

Turbo87 commented Nov 17, 2022

awesome, thank you :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants