Bulk add nodes and edges

[prasmussen15]

Important

Enhance graph database operations with bulk node and edge processing and introduce parallel runtime support for improved performance.

• Behavior:
  • Add group_id parameter to add_episode in graphiti.py.
  • Replace individual node and edge saves with add_nodes_and_edges_bulk() in graphiti.py.
  • Introduce USE_PARALLEL_RUNTIME in helpers.py for parallel query execution.
• Database Queries:
  • Add bulk save queries EPISODIC_EDGE_SAVE_BULK and ENTITY_EDGE_SAVE_BULK in edge_db_queries.py.
  • Add bulk save queries EPISODIC_NODE_SAVE_BULK and ENTITY_NODE_SAVE_BULK in node_db_queries.py.
• Search Utilities:
  • Use USE_PARALLEL_RUNTIME to conditionally apply parallel runtime in search_utils.py.
  • Reduce MAX_QUERY_LENGTH to 32 in search_utils.py.
• Utilities:
  • Add add_nodes_and_edges_bulk() and add_nodes_and_edges_bulk_tx() in bulk_utils.py for batch processing of nodes and edges.

^{This description was created by for 6f9d003. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to f4cc8e4 in 2 minutes and 0 seconds

More details

• Looked at 307 lines of code in 7 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 7 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:86

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a docstring to add_nodes_and_edges_bulk to describe its purpose, parameters, and return value.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The add_nodes_and_edges_bulk function in graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py is missing a docstring. This is important for understanding the purpose and usage of the function.

2. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:99

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding a docstring to add_nodes_and_edges_bulk_tx to describe its purpose, parameters, and return value.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The add_nodes_and_edges_bulk_tx function in graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py is missing a docstring. This is important for understanding the purpose and usage of the function.

3. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:452

• Draft comment:
  The change to use add_nodes_and_edges_bulk improves performance by reducing database calls. Good practice!
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The add_episode_endpoint function in graphiti_core/graphiti.py has been modified to use add_nodes_and_edges_bulk. This change improves performance by reducing the number of database calls, which is a good practice.

4. graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py:197

• Draft comment:
  Using USE_PARALLEL_RUNTIME to conditionally set the Cypher runtime to parallel is a good practice for optimizing query performance.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The USE_PARALLEL_RUNTIME environment variable is used to conditionally set the Cypher runtime to parallel. This is a good practice for optimizing query performance when supported by the database.

5. graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py:47

• Draft comment:
  Verify the impact of reducing MAX_QUERY_LENGTH from 128 to 32 on the ability to handle longer queries.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The MAX_QUERY_LENGTH has been reduced from 128 to 32 in graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py. This change might affect the ability to handle longer queries and should be verified for its impact on functionality.

6. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:86

• Draft comment:
  Consider refactoring add_nodes_and_edges_bulk to separate transaction handling from the logic of saving nodes and edges for better adherence to the Single Responsibility Principle.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The function add_nodes_and_edges_bulk is performing multiple tasks: saving nodes and edges, and handling transactions. It would be better to separate these responsibilities.

7. graphiti_core/models/edges/edge_db_queries.py:8

• Draft comment:
  The EPISODIC_EDGE_SAVE_BULK query is functionally similar to EPISODIC_EDGE_SAVE, differing mainly in handling multiple edges. Consider extending the existing query to support bulk operations.

• edge_db_queries.py

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment points out a potential code quality improvement by suggesting a refactor to avoid redundancy, which aligns with the DRY principle. This is actionable and clear, making it a useful comment. The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the addition of EPISODIC_EDGE_SAVE_BULK.
  The comment assumes that extending the existing query is feasible without considering potential differences in how single and bulk operations might be handled. There might be reasons for keeping them separate that are not immediately apparent.
  While there could be reasons for keeping the queries separate, the suggestion to consider a refactor is still valid and worth exploring. The comment does not mandate a change but suggests a possible improvement.
  Keep the comment as it suggests a valid refactor to improve code quality by reducing redundancy, which is actionable and clear.

Workflow ID: wflow_GFZ8Kvshvzrf1Sdr

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b1b07b8 in 26 seconds

More details

• Looked at 53 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py:448

• Draft comment:
  The indentation of the Cypher query is inconsistent. Align it properly for better readability.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The indentation of the Cypher query in community_similarity_search is inconsistent with the rest of the code. It should be aligned properly for better readability.

2. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:24

• Draft comment:
  The removal of Query import is good as it was unused.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The import of Query from neo4j in bulk_utils.py is removed but not used anywhere in the file. This is a good change as it cleans up unused imports.

3. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:24

• Draft comment:
  The import statement for Query has been removed, which is good as it was not used in the file. Ensure all imports are necessary to keep the code clean.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The import statement for Query in bulk_utils.py is removed but not used anywhere in the file. This is a good change as it removes unused imports, keeping the code clean.

Workflow ID: wflow_Pm8t13WwH8HV0F7n

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 370f1a9 in 13 seconds

More details

• Looked at 12 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. pyproject.toml:3

• Draft comment:
  Ensure that the version update to 0.3.20 reflects all changes made in this PR, including bulk operations and parallel runtime support.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 33%
  The version update in pyproject.toml is consistent with the PR description, indicating a new feature or enhancement.

2. pyproject.toml:1

• Draft comment:
  No issues found in this file as it does not contain Python code.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 0%
  The pyproject.toml file does not contain any Python code, so the rules related to Python code do not apply here. However, I should check for any secrets or credentials, which are not present in this file.

Workflow ID: wflow_8RiLmfp6f2ktm99Z

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 6f9d003 in 14 seconds

More details

• Looked at 36 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. README.md:198

• Draft comment:
  The roadmap section has inconsistent checkboxes. The task 'Improving performance and scalability' is marked as incomplete, but the PR description suggests improvements in performance. Consider updating the roadmap to reflect the current status.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The README file contains a minor inconsistency in the roadmap section. The checkboxes for completed tasks are inconsistent with the description provided in the PR.

Workflow ID: wflow_Es4uUjTAnReiu7VK

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.