whisper : make beam candidate sort more stable #1943
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly reduces the cache size. I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference, but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam. Added as part of understanding ggerganov#1941.
ggerganov
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2024
jiahansu
pushed a commit
to WiseSync/whisper.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2024
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly reduces the cache size. I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference, but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam. Added as part of understanding ggerganov#1941.
viktor-silakov
pushed a commit
to viktor-silakov/whisper_node_mic.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2024
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly reduces the cache size. I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference, but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam. Added as part of understanding ggerganov#1941.
iThalay
pushed a commit
to iThalay/whisper.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly reduces the cache size. I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference, but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam. Added as part of understanding ggerganov#1941.
iThalay
pushed a commit
to iThalay/whisper.cpp
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly reduces the cache size. I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference, but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam. Added as part of understanding ggerganov#1941.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All else being otherwise equal, this encourages the beam candidate
selection to re-use the same decoder, which slightly
reduces the cache size.
I wouldn't expect it to make much of a performance difference,
but it helps when debug printing the cache and beam.
Added as part of understanding #1941.