-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.5k
Nix portability improvements #13005
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hacker1024
wants to merge
9
commits into
ggml-org:master
Choose a base branch
from
hacker1024:fix/nix-portability
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+34
−5
Open
Nix portability improvements #13005
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8e426df
build(nix): Use a split derivation
hacker1024 b507bb4
build(nix): Move shaderc to nativeBuildInputs
hacker1024 bf1f1b3
build(nix): Propagate BLAS appropriately
hacker1024 b1f01c7
build(nix): Allow using OpenMP
hacker1024 60092b4
cmake: Only link stdc++fs on GCC
hacker1024 70a689e
build(nix): Add hacker1024 as a Nix package maintainer
hacker1024 4bffb15
build(nix): Allow disabling common, tests, examples, server
hacker1024 ff1ac5c
build(nix): Don't set CMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH
hacker1024 4a4a753
build(nix): Enable tests
hacker1024 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ poetry.toml | |
|
||
# Nix | ||
/result | ||
/result-* | ||
|
||
# Test binaries | ||
/tests/test-backend-ops | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should there be a special branch for https://releases.llvm.org/10.0.0/projects/libcxx/docs/UsingLibcxx.html#id2? Note that clang does not necessarily mean libc++, and gcc does not necessarily mean libstdc++ (e.g. in Nixpkgs all stdenvs use the same stdlib determined by the platform)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also idk about
libdl
handlingThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Potentially. I guess it depends on how many systems we actually want to support - the original change was required for GCC on RHEL 8, so there's a reason for this branch for that use case.
I'm not sure if it's worth preemptively handling ancient LLVM versions as well unless either someone explicitly requires it or we're actively testing it...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's then add a comment explaining the "why"s