Skip to content

Conversation

@JohannesGaessler
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #8254 . The problem as far as I can tell is that for determining the boundaries between CUDA blocks I implicitly assumed that the ne00/ne10 dimension of the matrices is a multiple of the number of values processed by MMQ in a single iteration (128 in this case). So for deepseek where ne00 is only a multiple of 64 the results were wrong.

@JohannesGaessler JohannesGaessler added the Review Complexity : Medium Generally require more time to grok but manageable by beginner to medium expertise level label Jul 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Nvidia GPU Issues specific to Nvidia GPUs label Jul 4, 2024
Nexesenex added a commit to Nexesenex/croco.cpp that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Co-Authored-By: Johannes Gäßler <johannesg@5d6.de>
@JohannesGaessler JohannesGaessler merged commit bcefa03 into ggml-org:master Jul 5, 2024
Nexesenex added a commit to Nexesenex/croco.cpp that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2024
Co-Authored-By: Johannes Gäßler <johannesg@5d6.de>
Nexesenex added a commit to Nexesenex/croco.cpp that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2024
Co-Authored-By: Johannes Gäßler <johannesg@5d6.de>
arthw pushed a commit to arthw/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
arthw pushed a commit to arthw/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Nvidia GPU Issues specific to Nvidia GPUs Review Complexity : Medium Generally require more time to grok but manageable by beginner to medium expertise level

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: Failed to load quantizied DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat model

2 participants