You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
+1 for a classoption. LNCS uses "norunningheads".
Reasoning: Most editors seem to use other tooling than the provided at
https://gi-ev.github.io/LNI-proceedings/. To ease the other tooling,
headers and footers should not be present in the camera ready version.
Am Mi., 20. Feb. 2019, 09:51 hat Martin Sievers <notifications@github.com>
geschrieben:
I got an email today asking how to remove the running header as this was
requested by a conference call for papers ("Wissensmanagement Konferenz").
The solution is not complicated:
\pagestyle{empty}\fancypagestyle{plain}{%
\fancyhead{}
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0.0pt}
}%
Howver, I wonder, whether this is a common usecase so that an option for
the document class would be a good idea.
@koppor <https://github.com/koppor> What do you think?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#77>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTafj4nCKNTdiI-vP7t-pfQlzt-7nw5ks5vPQyZgaJpZM4bEtRj>
.
I got an email today asking how to remove the running header as this was requested by a conference call for papers ("Wissensmanagement Konferenz").
The solution is not complicated:
Howver, I wonder, whether this is a common usecase so that an option for the document class would be a good idea.
@koppor What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: