Added documentation for git-lfs-ls-files' */- output.

[bilke]

This functionality was introduced in 2082b26 but was not documented.

[blanca92]

Algo bien

[blanca92]

Algo bien

[technoweenie]

Nice catch! Did you accept the CLA by chance? If you did, it's probably waiting for another CI run. I can push up a merge commit or something to trigger it.

[bilke]

Yes I accepted the CLA.

[mathstuf]

FYI, closing and reopening the PR will also retrigger CI runs.

[atskhan]

https://www.instagram.com/afreen3651/ Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: risk danger olson <notifications@github.com> Date: 09/11/2017 1:43 am (GMT+05:30) To: git-lfs/git-lfs <git-lfs@noreply.github.com> Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com> Subject: Re: [git-lfs/git-lfs] Added documentation for git-lfs-ls-files' */- output. (#2719) Closed #2719. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread. {"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/git-lfs/git-lfs","title":"git-lfs/git-lfs","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"DESCRIPTION","message":"Closed #2719."}],"action":{"name":"View Pull Request","url":"#2719 (comment)"}}}

[tchebb]

Am I misunderstanding the wording, or is this documentation backwards? When I run git lfs ls-files, I see - for pointers and * for files with content.

[mathstuf]

Agreed; the documentation is backwards. However, looking at the code, if the content size is the same as the pointer size, a false positive would be output. Might be worth another issue, but I'm not sure how important it is to fix.

[ttaylorr]

Am I misunderstanding the wording, or is this documentation backwards?

Thanks for letting us know; the documentation was indeed backwards. I opened #3496 to fix.