-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
update expo fp version #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the versions of three dependencies in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tagpr.yml (1)
1-13: Summary: New automated versioning and tagging workflow addedThis new workflow introduces automated versioning and tagging using the tagpr action, which can significantly improve the release management process. It triggers on pushes to the main branch, ensuring that new versions are created consistently with main branch updates.
Key points:
- Automated versioning can lead to more consistent and frequent releases.
- The workflow uses GitHub Actions, integrating well with the existing GitHub infrastructure.
- It uses the repository's GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication, which is a secure practice.
Potential impacts:
- This may change how version numbers are managed in the project.
- It could affect the frequency and nature of releases.
- Developers will need to be aware of the conventional commits format for commit messages.
To fully leverage this new workflow:
- Update the project's contributing guidelines to include information about the conventional commits format.
- Consider setting up branch protection rules on the main branch to ensure quality before triggering this workflow.
- Integrate this workflow with other CI/CD processes to create a comprehensive release pipeline.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/tagpr.yml (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/tagpr.yml (2)
1-4: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are appropriate.The workflow name "tagpr" clearly indicates its purpose, and triggering on pushes to the main branch is suitable for automated versioning and tagging.
8-10: LGTM: Appropriate runner and checkout action.Using
ubuntu-latestas the runner andactions/checkout@v4for checking out the repository are both good practices. The latest major version of the checkout action is used, which is recommended.
| jobs: | ||
| tagpr: | ||
| permissions: write-all |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider restricting permissions.
While the job name "tagpr" is consistent with the workflow name, the "write-all" permission is very broad. It's generally recommended to follow the principle of least privilege.
Consider restricting the permissions to only what's necessary for the tagpr action. For example:
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: writeThis would allow the action to create tags, releases, and pull requests without granting unnecessary permissions.
| - uses: Songmu/tagpr@v1 | ||
| env: | ||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more specific version of tagpr and add a comment explaining its purpose.
While using the tagpr action is good for automated versioning and tagging, and the GITHUB_TOKEN usage is secure, there are a couple of suggestions:
- It's generally better to pin to a more specific version of actions to avoid unexpected changes. Consider using a specific minor or patch version.
- Add a comment explaining the purpose of this action for better maintainability.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- name: Run tagpr
uses: Songmu/tagpr@v1.1.1 # Pin to a specific version
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
# This action automates versioning and tagging based on conventional commitsAlso, ensure that your commit messages follow the conventional commits format for this action to work effectively.
Summary by CodeRabbit
com.expofp:commonupdated to version4.6.0com.expofp:fplanupdated to version4.6.0com.expofp:crowdconnectedupdated to version4.6.0