forked from agentic-review-benchmarks/dify
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Code Review Bench PR #30339 - feat: get plan bulk with cache #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ketkarameya
wants to merge
4
commits into
base_pr_30339_20260125_4193
Choose a base branch
from
corrupted_pr_30339_20260125_4193
base: base_pr_30339_20260125_4193
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
get_plan_bulksets None instead of skipping invalid tenantsOn line 292, when validation fails for a tenant's plan data, the code sets
results[tenant_id] = None. This contradicts the intended behavior (skip invalid tenants) and has two downstream consequences:Test failure: The unit test
test_get_plan_bulk_with_invalid_tenant_plan_skippedasserts"tenant-invalid" not in resultandlen(result) == 2, but the code adds the invalid tenant with valueNone, solen(result)will be 3 and the assertion will fail.Type violation:
get_plan_bulkis typed as returningdict[str, SubscriptionPlan], but it returnsNonevalues. This propagates intoget_plan_bulk_with_cachewhich will addNonetotenant_plans, cache"null"in Redis (viajson.dumps(None)), and on the next cache read,validate_python(None)will fail, causing a perpetual miss-refetch-cache cycle for that tenant.The fix is to use
continueinstead of assigningNone.Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎