Skip to content

Conversation

@henrymercer
Copy link
Contributor

Improve the experience of using the updating dependencies workflow:

  • Mark the PR as draft if we pushed a commit to update the dependencies.
  • Add a comment asking the user to mark the PR as ready for review to trigger the checks.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Confirm the readme has been updated if necessary.
  • Confirm the changelog has been updated if necessary.

@henrymercer henrymercer requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2023 14:38
Copy link
Contributor

@TomBolton TomBolton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@henrymercer henrymercer merged commit 37d8d03 into main Sep 5, 2023
@henrymercer henrymercer deleted the henrymercer/improve-dependency-update branch September 5, 2023 15:38
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2023
6 tasks
webknjaz added a commit to ansible/pylibssh that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Normally, PRs/commits published using the default GitHub Actions CI/CD
API token are not propagated to any integrations. This patch marks the
release PR as a draft and leaves a comment asking the maintainers to
mark it as ready for review in order to actually trigger a CI run.

This idea is found in GitHub's own repos:
* github/codeql-action#2263 (comment)
* https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/4ebadbc7/.github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml#L38-L41
* github/codeql-action#1868
* github/codeql-action#679
webknjaz added a commit to webknjaz/pytest that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
Normally, PRs/commits published using the default GitHub Actions CI/CD
API token are not propagated to any integrations. This patch marks the
plugin update PR as a draft and leaves a comment asking the maintainers to
mark it as ready for review in order to actually trigger a CI run.

This idea is found in GitHub's own repos:
* github/codeql-action#2263 (comment)
* https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/4ebadbc7/.github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml#L38-L41
* github/codeql-action#1868
* github/codeql-action#679
webknjaz added a commit to webknjaz/pytest that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
Normally, PRs/commits published using the default GitHub Actions CI/CD
API token are not propagated to any integrations. This patch marks the
plugin update PR as a draft and leaves a comment asking the maintainers to
mark it as ready for review in order to actually trigger a CI run.

This idea is found in GitHub's own repos:
* github/codeql-action#2263 (comment)
* https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/4ebadbc7/.github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml#L38-L41
* github/codeql-action#1868
* github/codeql-action#679
webknjaz added a commit to webknjaz/pytest that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
Normally, PRs/commits published using the default GitHub Actions CI/CD
API token are not propagated to any integrations. This patch marks the
plugin update PR as a draft and leaves a comment asking the maintainers to
mark it as ready for review in order to actually trigger a CI run.

This idea is found in GitHub's own repos:
* github/codeql-action#2263 (comment)
* https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/4ebadbc7/.github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml#L38-L41
* github/codeql-action#1868
* github/codeql-action#679
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/pytest that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Normally, PRs/commits published using the default GitHub Actions CI/CD
API token are not propagated to any integrations. This patch marks the
plugin update PR as a draft and leaves a comment asking the maintainers to
mark it as ready for review in order to actually trigger a CI run.

This idea is found in GitHub's own repos:
* github/codeql-action#2263 (comment)
* https://github.com/github/codeql-action/blob/4ebadbc7/.github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml#L38-L41
* github/codeql-action#1868
* github/codeql-action#679
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants