Skip to content

Conversation

@mbg
Copy link
Member

@mbg mbg commented Oct 24, 2025

Adds a changelog entry for #3222

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.

Which use cases does this change impact?

N/A

How did/will you validate this change?

N/A

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

N/A

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

N/A

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

@mbg mbg requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2025 16:08
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 24, 2025 16:08
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a changelog entry documenting a behavioral change in the CodeQL Action's post-processing of SARIF files. The change ensures that post-processing steps are always performed regardless of upload settings, which may affect Advanced Setup users who use non-default upload input values.

  • Adds a changelog entry for PR #3222 that modifies SARIF post-processing behavior

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Should be very easy to review label Oct 24, 2025
@mbg mbg enabled auto-merge October 24, 2025 16:12
@mbg mbg merged commit 1d36546 into main Oct 24, 2025
243 checks passed
@mbg mbg deleted the mbg/changelog/post-processing branch October 24, 2025 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Should be very easy to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants