Skip to content

Conversation

@henrymercer
Copy link
Contributor

This was added back by a bad merge.

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.

Which use cases does this change impact?

  • Advanced setup - Impacts users who have custom workflows.
  • Default setup - Impacts users who use default setup.
  • Code Scanning - Impacts Code Scanning (i.e. analysis-kinds: code-scanning).
  • Code Quality - Impacts Code Quality (i.e. analysis-kinds: code-quality).
  • Third-party analyses - Impacts third-party analyses (i.e. upload-sarif).
  • GHES - Impacts GitHub Enterprise Server.

How did/will you validate this change?

  • Unit tests - I am depending on unit test coverage (i.e. tests in .test.ts files).
  • End-to-end tests - I am depending on PR checks (i.e. tests in pr-checks).

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

  • Rollback - Change can only be disabled by rolling back the release or releasing a new version with a fix.

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

  • Telemetry - I rely on existing telemetry or have made changes to the telemetry.
    • Alerts - New or existing monitors will trip if something goes wrong with this change.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

This was added back by a bad merge.
@henrymercer henrymercer requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2025 10:41
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2025 10:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Should be very easy to review label Oct 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the console-log-level dependency and its associated TypeScript type definitions that were inadvertently reintroduced through a bad merge. The changes clean up the dependency declarations from both the source package.json and all generated JavaScript bundles.

Key changes:

  • Removed console-log-level from runtime dependencies
  • Removed @types/console-log-level from development dependencies

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 13 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
package.json Removed unused console-log-level dependency and its type definitions
lib/upload-sarif-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/upload-sarif-action-post.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/upload-lib.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/start-proxy-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/start-proxy-action-post.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/setup-codeql-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/resolve-environment-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/init-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/init-action-post.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/autobuild-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/analyze-action.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle
lib/analyze-action-post.js Removed dependency references from generated bundle

@henrymercer henrymercer merged commit 514ff4d into main Oct 30, 2025
243 checks passed
@henrymercer henrymercer deleted the henrymercer/resolve-bad-merge branch October 30, 2025 11:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Should be very easy to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants