-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: describe conditional values #31252
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5917b79
refactor: describe an acceptable `if` value
deemp b46ddeb
Revert "refactor: describe an acceptable `if` value"
deemp 596ce33
feat: explain coercion of falsy and truthy values
deemp 174cfa5
Update content/actions/learn-github-actions/expressions.md
SiaraMist 479d72e
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-explain-if-condition
SiaraMist File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This... isn't correct at all.
The workflow is parsed in a string context (except for numerals and booleans), so JavaScript truthiness is irrelevant. There's no way to define a true JavaScript
NaN
orundefined
in YML, you end up with the strings'NaN'
or'undefined'
. Nearly any string will evaluatetrue
.In this workflow:
...The only
matrix.runme
values for whichfalse-path
will be executed arefalse
and0
. (And-0
, technically, but that's only because it's interpreted as0
. There's no distinction in YAML.) All of the others will evaluatetrue
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, sorry,
null
is also a valid YAML primitive, and it will also evaluatefalse
.Honestly, I think this is pretty well explained in the Literals section of the Expressions docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ran the suggested job (link). I can confirm that the falsy values are
false
,0
,-0
,""
,''
,null
. I can't see where these values are listed in the Literals section. What do you think about just extending theboolean
docs?boolean
false
,0
,-0
,""
,''
,null
) or truthy (true
and other non-falsy values)I believe it's necessary to mention in the
if
docs that it expects aboolean
and will run a step if theboolean
is truthy. BTW, the docs already mention atruthy
value (link), but don't explain it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the PR